Agreement or disagreement with the proposed statement needs a comprehensive study of the culture and traditions of the past people. Indeed, the people behaviors have been changed over time and so these alternations emanate a conspicuous diversity between the people in the past and the present. The assessment of the statement depends on plenty of factors. It’s possible that somebody responds to this question promptly; nevertheless, it’s just his or her opinion and doesn’t involve all the aspects. One of the possible ways to reach an acceptable answer is that we compare the features of the people behaviors over time. Indeed through a fair comparison, an authentic respond will be gained. As far as I’m concerned, I think the people appreciated more the teachers than nowadays. The following paragraphs will properly elucidate my perspective through three outstanding reasons.
First of all, one of the most important reasons is that the people in the past expressed huge respects to the knowledge and sciences by virtue of the knowledge had a peculiar place for them. However, some of the people didn't accept that place. Certainly, giving an example can ease the explanation of the issue, my grandmother had told me about her memoir in the school when she and her pleas were touching the clothes of their teacher since they thought the teacher is an extraordinary people with peculiar prestige. Therefore the special place of the teacher among others is clarified by the proffered example.
Another significant reason is that the teachers were selected from gentlemen and gentlewomen. Although some of them had a few imperfections in their behaviors, almost all the teachers in the past were so respectful. For instance, my mother told me her teacher came from a respectable family which all the people in Tehran known appreciated them. She asserted that he always spoke in the class politely. Needless to say, that all the people will respect such a gentleman teacher.
Finally, the last reason I should mention it is that the people in the past were more respectful and appreciated the moralities more than the present. By the way of example, the type of the daily conversation has modified over time. The people greeted each other graciously. In contrast, the informal and somehow impolitely greetings replace the gentle ones.
In brief, with the aid of the aforementioned reasons the remarkable place of the teachers in the past is illustrated. Having respect for the knowledge and scientists besides to the morality traditions in the past clarify the situation. Of course, besides the merits of the selected choice, there are a few contradicting shreds of evidence but they cannot hurt the overall prominence of being respectful with teachers more in the past. And so, I adopt a firm position that the Teacher was more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 133, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Indeed,
...ture and traditions of the past people. Indeed the people behaviors have been changed ...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 646, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Indeed,
...ures of the people behaviors over time. Indeed through a fair comparison an authentic ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 201, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...had a peculiar place for them. However, some of the people didnt accept that place. Certain...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 220, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...e for them. However, some of the people didnt accept that place. Certainly, giving an...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 519, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ordinary people with peculiar prestige. Therefore the special place of the teacher among ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, finally, first, however, if, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, for instance, i think, in brief, in contrast, of course, by the way, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 52.1666666667 138% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2463.0 1977.66487455 125% => OK
No of words: 476.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1743697479 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67091256922 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85582257557 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508403361345 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 752.4 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4568568185 48.9658058833 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.52 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.04 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36 5.45110844103 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 11.8709677419 168% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232152958936 0.236089414692 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0658048171196 0.076458572812 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0804379347981 0.0737576698707 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139674878583 0.150856017488 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0723417397796 0.0645574589148 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 86.8835125448 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.