When it comes to career university professor is a noble profession and has a tremendous wealth of knowledge to educate others in the education institution. In such case, I agree that the university should allocate more money as part of professor’s payment. I feel this way for one main reason, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, university professor not only work for certain hours that they are in the campus physically present. In addition to that, they also perform many task outside work hours. For instance, the lecture may deliver the lesson in the classroom for 90 minutes. However, he puts ample amount of time to prepare that lesson in order to execute the lecture in a more engaging way to benefit students. Moreover, they also allocate huge amount of time in marking to provide valuable feedback to students to notify students’ progress. In that scenario, some educators spend their family time to do so those extra work which often go unnoticed. When I was in sophomore year and pursuing physics, I was unsure about a formula in order to find the voltage for a circuit. I made a mistake in that assignment in the class and handed in the class as it was last hour. On the very next day, my professor spotted my mistake and explained to me how to rectify it. In that case, I am sure my teacher spent out of office hours to mark it and corrected me immediate. If he did not spot my mistake , my errors could have added up and messed up on my studies. So, it is more vital to pay more for post secondary educators that dedicate many hours to educate fellow students.
On the other hand, if educators at the university are not paid well, they might look for other part-time job to meet their needs and families needs. As a result, the university professor may unable to work efficiently which will directly influence student’s performance. In some situation, lecturer might move to another university that pays more. Therefore, the institution might lose an experienced educator. Gradually, the institution may have lack of experienced teachers which will bring down university’s reputation. The following example is a compelling example of this situation. The university called U of S which is in Canada had a budget cut, they they balanced their budget but cutting down the educators pay. So, many professors complete their contract and moved to another university in adjacent province that paid higher pay with free accommodation.
In conclusion, it is always extremely important to pay the educators that spend their career to educate other , because they spend their own time for their students and they deserve that.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 611, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s spend their family time to do so those extra work which often go unnoticed. Whe...
^^
Line 2, column 1090, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...immediate. If he did not spot my mistake , my errors could have added up and messe...
^^
Line 4, column 665, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: they
... S which is in Canada had a budget cut, they they balanced their budget but cutting down ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 829, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... another university in adjacent province that paid higher pay with free accommod...
^^
Line 4, column 851, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... adjacent province that paid higher pay with free accommodation. In conclusi...
^^
Line 6, column 110, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...that spend their career to educate other , because they spend their own time for t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, may, moreover, second, so, therefore, well, for instance, i feel, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2230.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 454.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91189427313 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61598047577 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83269505602 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52422907489 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 721.8 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.9932508334 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.9166666667 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9166666667 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.29166666667 5.45110844103 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110322848917 0.236089414692 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0356209617782 0.076458572812 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0391263049469 0.0737576698707 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.07936718421 0.150856017488 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0500999181459 0.0645574589148 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.