In today's societies, the question of it is more interesting whether to work only three days a week with long working hours or to work in five days for shorter time has become a very challenging issue among people in many circles and camps. Different people have various types of responses based on their cultural, social, economic, or even familial backgrounds. However, as far as I'm concerned, I believed that it is more appealing to have a job with three working days and longer hours for some reasons that I elaborate them in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, having a job with just three days of working give anyone a lot of free days that can use it in more efficient ways. One free day is much better than having just little free time in each days because this free day provides sufficient time for concentrating on new things and finish it before the end of the day. Therefore, every person can manage a lot of useful things in his free days. Let's make a brief explanation about that. According to the last survey that were conducted in Iran, the experts found out that if someone dedicates a full day to do a project instead of doing it in several days for shorter time, he will accomplish the project significantly better. moreover, it is more probable to finish it in less time.
Another noteworthy aspect that should be mention is that shorter working hours most of time interrupted the employees working. Thus, at the beginning of the working days, they have to review what they did the day before. So, they waste a lot of their time in reviewing what they did before. When the hours of the working days is added, employees can save this wasting time and dedicate them for doing another project in their companies. Let me shed a light on my point. Based on scientists’ experience, When a person decide to work on some projects, he will need at least ten hours to comprehend the basic of it. In addition, when he stop it and put it aside for more than about twelve hours, he need to review the project before getting start again. Consequently, It's more effective to work for longer hours.
In conclusion, there are a lot of reasons to say that it is more enjoyable to have a job with three working days a week for long hours. Not only people can use their free days for doing a lot of their desires But also they can be more efficient in their working place. Therefore, It is very better to manage working hours of employees by this method.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 382, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...amilial backgrounds. However, as far as Im concerned, I believed that it is more a...
^^
Line 3, column 403, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
... lot of useful things in his free days. Lets make a brief explanation about that. Ac...
^^^^
Line 3, column 685, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Moreover
...plish the project significantly better. moreover, it is more probable to finish it in le...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 42, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'mentioned'?
Suggestion: mentioned
...nother noteworthy aspect that should be mention is that shorter working hours most of t...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 640, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'stops'.
Suggestion: stops
...d the basic of it. In addition, when he stop it and put it aside for more than about...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, at least, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2030.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 446.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55156950673 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5955099915 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49991855726 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.468609865471 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 627.3 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.0947544203 48.9658058833 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.5 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.373013041797 0.236089414692 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121847017691 0.076458572812 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113549239215 0.0737576698707 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.271402341841 0.150856017488 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.075315423568 0.0645574589148 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 58.1214874552 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.41 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.