With the fast pace environment, It is becoming very challenging for people to have a work life balance. While some people may find it comfortable and pleasing to be at work everyday, others may hold a totally different view. I, definitely subscribe to working long hours for short days due to two prime and conspicuous reasons which I will elaborate on here below.
The first obvious point is the ample free time. When we engage in a job that requires long period, it avails the opportunity to channel our energy and minds to other vital and crucial aspects of our life. This invariably aids a balance with our work, social and spiritual life. Working for long hours also ensures relaxation of the mind, revitalization of energy and propels greater achievement. However, the opposite is the case, when we are involved in a duty that demands our five days out of the seven days of the week. In such situations, our mental capability and alertness is dwindled and this negates our active participation in executing our tasks. Admittedly, this results to poor performance of duties and great repercussion on the company as a whole.
The second point which comes to the mind is reduction in budget. Having to commute to work only three days a week conserves fuel consumption which leads to less expenses on gas. It is beneficial because such extra money can be used to fix up other demanding needs. For instance, when I worked in my former company and had to travel for 20 miles to and fro on a daily basis I spent 2000 dollars on gas. However, when I switched my schedule to long hours, the price of fuel consumption reduced remarkably. Apparently, this helped me to cut down on my expenses and to be thrifty on my limited resources.
To sum up, It is irrefutable to disregard the importance of working long hours as it creates an adequate time for other life achievements and dramatically reduces cost.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 174, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
... comfortable and pleasing to be at work everyday, others may hold a totally different vi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 157, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun expenses is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...nserves fuel consumption which leads to less expenses on gas. It is beneficial becau...
^^^^
Line 5, column 579, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...down on my expenses and to be thrifty on my limited resources. To sum up, It i...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, first, however, if, may, second, so, while, for instance, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1578.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 332.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75301204819 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7525374614 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584337349398 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.059269159 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8235294118 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5294117647 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.45110844103 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222694981799 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0667762737994 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062475783179 0.0737576698707 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130511536839 0.150856017488 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0263624756929 0.0645574589148 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.