Humankind is really quickly adapt to the changes in the world, such as the technological revolution. Because of the fast adaptation, we perceive this changes as something routine and usual. Therefore, I suppose that nowadays people are less satisfied and happy than they were in the past. I will reinforce my position by providing several examples.
In the first place, people perceive something as its meant to be. For example, aeroplanes a century ago were such a tremendous improvement of transportation’s quality and some people were even afraid to travel by aeroplane because they thought that flying metal thing was a kind of a magic trick. However, today people not only travelling without worries but sometimes they demand to travel with luxury and don’t praise what they have. In other words, some people complaining about WiFi absence as an aeroplane service, so to say, if they are not able to be online during the flight they will be really disappointing. I suppose that we should be happy that we have a possibility to travel long distances in such a short time.
Secondly, our grandparents past was really hard, they had to fight with paucity and hunger, but they still were really satisfied because they had each other. For example, my grandfather was telling me lots of stories about his childhood, and one of his stories I remembered the most. In Russia when he was young there wasn’t such thing as supermarkets, and when he for the first time tasted an orange, it was such a wonderful and captivating moment for him that he remembered it for the whole life. In the lights of above, I gather to say that today people can eat oranges all day long if they want, but they won’t feel such excitement as my grandfather felt.
And finally, it is really hard to surprise people with novel things. In other words, innovations are making so fast nowadays that our mind doesn’t perceive them as something unusual. For example, such thing as glasses of virtual reality didn’t praise enough by the society. However, I totally sure that this technology was a complete breakthrough in different areas from computer games to reality modulation for doctors.
To wrap up, I suppose that people should praise the moment they have more and try to catch every day of their lives
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 280, Rule ID: KIND_OF_A[1]
Message: Don't include 'a' after a classification term. Use simply 'kind of'.
Suggestion: kind of
...y thought that flying metal thing was a kind of a magic trick. However, today people not ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, really, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, for example, i suppose, kind of, such as, in other words, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1928.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 390.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94358974359 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79298454277 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525641025641 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 599.4 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7041965895 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.111111111 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.77777777778 5.45110844103 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14796357062 0.236089414692 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0549830236158 0.076458572812 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592777098893 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0974159259057 0.150856017488 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498479011121 0.0645574589148 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.