By and large, there are certain considerations or factors which everyone can take into account to investigate and examine the current people happiness and satisfaction against ancient people. Some people are in the conviction that ancient people was more happiness and sasatisfaction. Their supposition is at odds with the conception of some others belonging to another side embracing the view that current man-kind are more happy and satisfied. I am of the latter opinion, supporting that because currently people and things transported from one point to another more comfortable, moreover, I think that technological aggression caused influence our communication. Also, In support of this argument, we should note that people don’t have enough time to communicate with each other or travel to other places.
The first salient aspect to be introduced is that transportation is one of the most things that make us comfortable to ravel from one point to another one. In ancient, long time travels make people boring and consequencly they like to reach their destination quickly. For example, if a family want to have a trip from china want to see all over the world, they might be on the trip for several months. Of course some countries have many delicated places, but some others make them tiring. Aggression of transportation caused to people can travel all the edge of universe in very time-consumming way. Thus, transportation which is one of the current changes against ancient make us happier.
Another equally noteworthy point corroborating my stance is that communicating with peoples around the world is another features of the changing world. Communication with other people have many impacts in our life such as keeping us up to date about all events which occurs around them, or we can communicate with our family in every positions with one call. I think these impacts create when the worlds changed because each person who want to make a relationship with another person should send one proposal card or send a telegraph in ancient. For instance, if one person in India wants to ask a question about anything from one professor in United State, must travel or send a teegraph to him which is very time-consumming way.
In order to fully evaluate this argument, we need to have a significant amount of additional evidence before accepting or refusing it completely. The pieces of evidence we need to know more, then analyze, are that aggression in transportation or have some comfortable ways to communicate with other, or even modern technology are not very useful in some cases. According to changing world, many people should spend more and more time for achiving to money. I think changing world is mixed blessing.
From what was already mentioned, I firmly believe that it is more rational to beneficial of changing world. I have several reasons for holding this view, so since not only aggression in transportaion, but also make communication easier. However, one should pay attention to the fact that these changes influence many people because they should work more. As a matter of fact, some other reasons can be invoked to back up my perspective, but let us suffice to this.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, then, thus, for example, for instance, i think, of course, such as, as a matter of fact, by and large, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 81.0 52.1666666667 155% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.0752688172 272% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2688.0 1977.66487455 136% => OK
No of words: 527.0 407.700716846 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10056925996 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79129216042 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90664431447 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483870967742 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 857.7 618.680645161 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.502902959 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.869565217 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9130434783 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166167546445 0.236089414692 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.058288654954 0.076458572812 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0429435345207 0.0737576698707 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10466689468 0.150856017488 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349694644175 0.0645574589148 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.