TPO 33-Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much moreeffectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.Use specific reasons and examples t

Essay topics:

TPO 33-Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more
effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.

Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Without any shadow of doubts, teachers prepare different tasks for students to make them ready for their future life. There are plenty thinking that group projects have more positive effective on students, while there are some who believe that students should work alone. I am of the opinion that students can learn many aspects by working together than working alone. To support my stance, the following explanation will further elaborate on my perspective.
One of the remarkable aspects of the ongoing discussion is that by working together, students understand that the productivity of a whole team might enhance consequently. Since they are working together, they gradually realize that they can share their works and this can save time to reach a sooner result. Moreover, not only can they help each other but also motivate their group members to stick with the team. In essence, the immediate correction of the faults are one of the noticeable results, and also team members can stimulate the weak ones to work harder. For example, imagine that a teacher assigns a math problem for students and then categorize students to some groups. Obviously, they can get better results than working alone because they share their ideas towards the problem and after trying each method, the most accurate one will be soon transparent for a whole group.
Another reason which deserves to say some words here is that teachers can create an ambiance for students to get socialized in their school life by making group projects. Students are always shy and embarrassed in the begging of the school, and they do not know how to interact with other. To ease this process, teachers should encourage them to make some groups in each of their subjects to get to know each other better. Take my experience for instance, when I was in high school, because of being a new student in my school, I could not communicate with the people around. However, thanks to my teacher's method, I got used to talking and presenting my ideas to my friend after being a group member of a class project.
On the other hand, by working alone, students can focus better on their assignments. As youngsters have the tendency to play with each other when they meet, they cannot concentrate intensely on their subjects. Imagine a teacher assigns a project for students, and they work together as a group, but one of them brings his Ipad to the class. Instead of working and solving their assignments, they will play games which can decrease the performance of a whole team.
In sum, by contemplating all the reasons mentioned above, I am pretty convinced that there are many solid reasons to foster the idea that group works are more productive than working alone. Although students may be inclined in some cases to play games, group actions can not only instruct them to be more productive but also help them to find more friends and get socialized in their school.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 326, Rule ID: HELP_TO_FIND[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'help them find' instead.
Suggestion: help them find
...uct them to be more productive but also help them to find more friends and get socialized in thei...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, while, as to, for example, for instance, in some cases, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2434.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 498.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8875502008 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72397222731 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50452405935 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475903614458 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 738.9 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5586264006 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.904761905 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7142857143 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47619047619 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26641495072 0.236089414692 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0939553334844 0.076458572812 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485944241359 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164688605559 0.150856017488 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391025334407 0.0645574589148 61% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.