In the modern society, there’s no doubt that team working has became one of the most important skills for both children and adults. So I totally approve the point that working together can make students learn more effectively for the following reasons.
To begin with, what’s the most primary is that by working together, they can fully communicate with each other causing them have better acknowledge of the whole work. Through the communication, students enjoy the chance to express their own opinion and learn the advantages of others. For example, when I was in a summer school and required to make a present about culture. Not working alone, I chose to work in a team with four students who came from different countries. With a whole day’s communication, I got a better understand of other countries culture so that I can introduce it in more than just the view of my own country. Thus working together truly opens our horizon.
Moreover, working together is effective for reducing various of time. Let’s think about if you have to work alone which means wasting lots of time on preparation and the decision of sequence of work. On the contrary, by working together, you just need to care about your own tasks. This is a really effective way to save time and money. According to a research by the Peking University in 2016, the efficiency of working together is 2 times more than working alone in most situations. What’s more, when working together, you can ask any question when you have no idea. This is impossible if you just work alone.
Admittedly, sometimes working alone is also necessary such as studying math problems and final projects which normally are required to be done alone. However, these conditions are in fact limited. In most conditions, we have the power to work with friends or classmates.
Due to aforementioned reasons, it’s easy to draw a conclusion that working together is more effectively than working alone for better communication and saving more time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 68, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'become'.
Suggestion: become
...e's no doubt that team working has became one of the most important skills for bo...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 356, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...ay to save time and money. According to a research by the Peking University in 2016, the e...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, really, so, thus, for example, in fact, no doubt, such as, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1697.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 337.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03560830861 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79140965796 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545994065282 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.994623655914 201% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.2397170457 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.3157894737 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7368421053 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21052631579 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330307751086 0.236089414692 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107908313443 0.076458572812 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622591973734 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187351470495 0.150856017488 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0522490582308 0.0645574589148 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.