Recently there has been a widespread debate in whether government spend money on the education of young people or spend on universities. Personally, I think that the government should share the money with both levels. I feel this way because of three reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
Governments should think for two goals. First, short-term goal and second long them term goal. The short-term goal is to spend money on university students. This is because in a few years they will contribute to the market. A pharmacist will graduate in four years to serve patients. Providing good tools for pharmacists will give them the opportunity to practice accurately. One of the important tools is a subscription to different journals, so pharmacists can read articles and benefit from them.
The long-term goal is spending money in elementary schools. Governments need continuous growth economically and educationally. Therefore, they should spend money on the next generation. This is because they will be the lead on the country in ten years. A good example is Saudi Arabia’s soccer team. They spent a lot of money to teach young students how to play. They sent them to summer clubs in different countries. Now, once they turn 15-19 they got Asia cup for youth. If the government had not put a long-term goal for these students, they would not have gotten this cup.
Frankly speaking, spending money on universities is much beneficial because they are the role models for their children. Also, the tools are much more expensive compared to elementary schools. A good example is my wife, who is a kindergarten teacher. She spent from her own money to create teaching tools. It costs only a few dollars. Therefore, the government will not pay that much to schools. On the other hand, when I was in college, I did a research on nanotechnology device which cost the university one million. Therefore, the government will spend more money on universities.
All in all, I totally not agree or disagree with the statement because governments should focus on short and long-term goals to get the benefit from spending money on education.
- At the end of the Triassic period 200 million years ago, there was a mass-extinction event that caused the extinction of more than half of all living species. It was this extinction event that allowed dinosaurs to become the dominant species for the next 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject. 60
- TPO-41 - Integrated Writing Task Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash, a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harm 81
- TPO-03 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement:People often buy products not because they really need them, but because other people have them. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 463, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Asia) must be used with a third-person verb: 'cups'.
Suggestion: cups
...Now, once they turn 15-19 they got Asia cup for youth. If the government had not pu...
^^^
Line 7, column 445, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...ther hand, when I was in college, I did a research on nanotechnology device which cost the...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, frankly, if, second, so, therefore, i feel, i think, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1806.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 358.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04469273743 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88513818497 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527932960894 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 20.1344086022 60% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.6363700963 48.9658058833 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 64.5 100.406767564 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.7857142857 20.6045352989 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.14285714286 5.45110844103 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 16.0 4.88709677419 327% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273031269448 0.236089414692 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745900293635 0.076458572812 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0732264635194 0.0737576698707 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169651931058 0.150856017488 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385559093857 0.0645574589148 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 11.7677419355 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.76 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.1575268817 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.06 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.0537634409 68% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.