The reading and the listening passages are both about a new tactic term called buzzing, which means when companies hire someone, who get paid, to promote some products for people they know or meet. Also, it states that many critics want to see the buzzing banned because of three reasons, which the buzzer in the listening passage challenges each point.
Firstly, the author claims that because the buzzers are paid, they give incorrect information about the buzzed product. However, the student contends that saying wrong information is not true. In fact, the companies hire people who like the products in order to say the truth for costumers.
Secondly, the reading article averts that people heard from buzzers less critically than they should. The student contradicts this point by saying it is the opposite. Actually, the people ask a lot about price, and how long have you use this product? Therefore, if the product not good, people will not buy it.
Finally, the reading passage mentions that buzzing will affect social relationship because it spreads mistrust and dishonesty, The buzzer rebuts this claim and he points out that companies hire the people who love the product. If the buzzer speaks about it, people are going to love because they will have a good experience with it.
In conclusion, the lecturer clearly casts doubt on the points that the writer made in the reading.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 334, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ey will have a good experience with it. In conclusion, the lecturer clearly cast...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1174.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 232.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06034482759 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33593649027 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586206896552 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 336.6 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1486678675 49.2860985944 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8333333333 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06452816374 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365415024742 0.272083759551 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131950165062 0.0996497079465 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.086409065689 0.0662205650399 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192442708143 0.162205337803 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0966792796926 0.0443174109184 218% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.