TPO 37 Do you agree or disagree with the following statements? Because people are busy doing so many different things, they do very few things well. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is very essential to be specialized in whatever you are doing to be productive. To have the most impact, it is very important to do anything that is done in the best way possible, and doing half things would never have a desirable result. I think these days people are doing so many different things that do are unable to do any of them well.
Firstly, by doing different things people can't focus and specialize in any of them. Any person has limited ability and time to learn. When someone is being constantly distracted by going to different directions of learning, they will not be able to focus on one thing and get the required practice to do it well. For example, I remember in my previous summer holidays I registered in four different educational classes including two programming languages, working with UNIX systems and software design course. Actually at the end of summer I did not really know any of these courses well enough to do independent work on them, but my friend Mina just attended UNIX systems class and dedicated the rest of her time to study and practice whatever has been taught in the class and at the end of a course she was so advanced in the course that our teacher offered a parttime job as a UNIX system administrator. So, by focusing on one thing and practicing a lot she had a very much better result than me.
Secondly, When you focus on some subject you will be able to observe every aspect of that subject and learn all there is about that. By learning everything about one subject, instead of jumping from one thing to the other thing, people will learn it very much deeper and will be able to perform better. For example, to do routine checkups of my car I usually go to a mechanic who knows something about every part of any car, but he is really unable to find root-cause of issues in my car or fix them. On the other hand, there is this guy, that has a small place at the corner and specializes in Pejout car's electrical systems. Although he does not know anything special about other parts of my car, he has a very deep knowledge on the car's electricity and can detect any kind of issues in the electricity system from a mile. Because of his specialization, he is very successful in his job and his income is some much more than the other person who just does check-ups. So, by going deeper in every subject and observing every aspect of it performance levels will increase exponentially.
In summary, doing different things stop people from doing a few things well. To specialize in something one should go deep in gaining every knowledge possible in that area and do lots of practice to get perfect on that one subject.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 282, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
... I think these days people are doing so many different things that do are unable to do any of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 43, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...rstly, by doing different things people cant focus and specialize in any of them. An...
^^^^
Line 5, column 708, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[6]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'very deep knowledge'.
Suggestion: very deep knowledge
...ial about other parts of my car, he has a very deep knowledge on the cars electricity and can detect ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, firstly, if, really, second, secondly, so, well, for example, i think, in summary, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 52.1666666667 144% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2193.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 484.0 407.700716846 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.53099173554 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69041575982 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55557299172 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.469008264463 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 702.9 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.7473315928 48.9658058833 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.833333333 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8888888889 20.6045352989 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.27777777778 5.45110844103 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258921539898 0.236089414692 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103164377933 0.076458572812 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112419813021 0.0737576698707 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211459093014 0.150856017488 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107416531142 0.0645574589148 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.29 10.9000537634 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.