For hundreds of years, the debate over whether people can become a leader through learning is still fierce. Some may suggest that leadership is a talent and comes naturally, and one can never find a way to be a leader through study. However, I hold this view differently. I firmly believe that no one is born with leadership.
To begin with, as an old saying goes, "Man is the product of the environment." Leadership can be considered a special personality, and there are countless cases that indicate that people can acquire leadership through learning and training. Nowadays, books related to the theory of success and how to become a leader dominate bestseller lists. More and more business and military schools provide people with a series of courses about leadership formation, which includes organizing a group, leading subordinates to compete with others, and even taking part in real military simulations. These practices do help people to cultivate leadership. Moreover, take the famous WestPoint military school as an example. It educated numerous commanders and sent these excellent people to different battlefields. Their courage and accomplishments helped WestPoint military school set a good reputation and prove outstanding leaders can be trained through learning.
Furthermore, there is no scientific evidence that proves leadership is an inherent and genetic character. Plenty of cases have confirmed that; one of these is Abraham Lincoln, whose father did shoe shining in streets, but Lincoln has been considered one of the most important presidents in United States history. Besides, if leadership is an inherent quality, why do those offspring of politicians rarely inherit the position from their parents? According to a recent study conducted by Harvard University, researchers divided people into two groups and imparted the theory of leadership into only one group. Consequently, it turned out that only people from the educated group had aspirations and abilities to become a leader.
In a nutshell, it is undoubtedly that no one was born with leadership for the reasons discussed above.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 118, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'suggests'.
Suggestion: suggests
...ough learning is still fierce. Some may suggest that leadership is a talent and comes n...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, of course, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1797.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 331.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42900302115 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00741895635 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.601208459215 0.524837075471 115% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.4549075572 48.9658058833 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.705882353 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4705882353 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11764705882 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182163666393 0.236089414692 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592593503875 0.076458572812 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457368638288 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125107937146 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0309604243891 0.0645574589148 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 10.9000537634 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.01818996416 118% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 118, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'suggests'.
Suggestion: suggests
...ough learning is still fierce. Some may suggest that leadership is a talent and comes n...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, of course, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1797.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 331.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42900302115 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00741895635 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.601208459215 0.524837075471 115% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.4549075572 48.9658058833 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.705882353 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4705882353 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11764705882 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182163666393 0.236089414692 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592593503875 0.076458572812 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457368638288 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125107937146 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0309604243891 0.0645574589148 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 10.9000537634 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.01818996416 118% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.