Cars and modern ways of commuting have changed cities' architecture, lifestyle, and the environment. Although communication is vital, I do not think there is any place for cars in the future. Human beings face a shortage of energy supply especially fossil fuels. Besides, we have polluted our planet since the industrial revolution, and it is time to review our behavior towards the earth. On the other hand, technology always surprises us with new inventions.
First, some scientists have predicted that our resources will be exhausted by 2050 and as you are aware cars combust fossil fuels to run. As a result, we will have fewer cars because of the scarcity of fuel. Even if we thriftily use this precious resources, we can not expect to have them for a long time. There are, however, some alternative fuels such as biodiesel, which is derived from agriculture products, they can not be as practical as fossil fuels.
Second, we have contaminated our planet with our cars, and it is high time to cease producing them. Scientists have reported that earth average temperature is increasing 0.5 degrees annually.
Furthermore, they claim the primary reason is greenhouse gases which trap warmth. Cars release large amounts of carbon dioxide as they run and that is why we should stop using cars in the future to save our planet.
Third, science and technology always bring us new devices, methods and exceptionally efficient ways of commuting. For example, I read an article about Hyper-Loops, which is one of the most high-tech breakthroughs in the communication industry. They can be used as public transportation. Not only they are clean, comfortable, quick but also they can get people where they want as soon as possible.
For all the reasons that I have stated, I believe cars will be obsolete soon. We do not have fuels to run our vehicles forever, and they endanger life on earth. I am sure science and technology will find appropriate solutions for the problem aforementioned.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 10, column 259, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lutions for the problem aforementioned.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, third, for example, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 52.1666666667 46% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1677.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 331.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0664652568 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87813469652 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592145015106 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.6720827833 48.9658058833 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.85 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.55 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.