TPO-41 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Change the behaviour of society has always been a very significant matter when it comes to some kind of jobs like teacher. That is owing to the fact that they can have momentous effect on the future of the society and it is important to how behave with them. There are those who contend that in comparison to the past, teacher less appreciate by the society. I personally concur with this statement as it seems rational. In what follows, I will attempt to clarify the reasons for my decision more.

To begin with, the most imperative reason comes to mind at first is about the value of the knowledge which have. In the past, teachers were the people who knew the more in comparison to the other people specifically if we consider small cities. in this situation, they were faced with better behaviour. My father who was studied at school about 50 years ago, always say that in that time, some of rural people think the teacher know everything and sometimes ask them question about medical or other different knowledges. Also, they always consider what the teachers say when they want to vote. This is due to the fact that people have been accepted teachers as someone who can learn them everything and because of this matter, they trust them most of the time. We all know that this in never happened in these days.

Another interesting point which deserves some point here is that nowadays, student be more rude and most of them are not polite and thanksful about whatever the teachers learn to them. For instance, my mother who has a good grasp of knowledge, sometimes said that these changes of the behaviour with teachers, considering her era and nowadays, make her some troble always. It is conspicuous that she expect that student behave to her same as her behaviour with teachers in the past, but she always be in troble and could not find what the student did.

To wrap it all up, taking all the aforementioned ideas into consideration, I believe that not only was the unique knowledge of the teachers in the past more considerable, but also the rudeness of student increase nowadays and both of these reasons create a society which have less precios for teachers.

Votes
Average: 6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 246, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...ecifically if we consider small cities. in this situation, they were faced with be...
^^
Line 5, column 366, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
... era and nowadays, make her some troble always. It is conspicuous that she expect that...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 492, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[5]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put after the verb 'be'.
Suggestion: be always
...iour with teachers in the past, but she always be in troble and could not find what the s...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 499, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
...th teachers in the past, but she always be in troble and could not find what the s...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, for instance, kind of, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.0286738351 199% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1801.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 382.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71465968586 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45983190587 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497382198953 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 558.9 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.1938146185 48.9658058833 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.5625 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.875 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.45110844103 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183390799969 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0679276919146 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0334313704945 0.0737576698707 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116081805107 0.150856017488 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0367745436829 0.0645574589148 57% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 86.8835125448 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.