By and large, the significance of children is little debate in today's society. This is due to the fact that children are one of the important criteria which have the best portion in future of the country and since they can have the best influence on it, they should grow up in the best way that it's possible for their family. On should keep in mind, it's not surprising to notice that like all prominent, its aspects are subject to discussion and analysis. For instance, what is the more important things for children when their parents have little time to spend with them is controversial.
A question that sometimes raised in this regard is what is the best way for the family to allocate their limit time for their children? 1. Using it to have fun playing games and sports, 2. Using it to work on something that related to their schoolwork or assignment.
I personally prefer to do the first option as it seems more logical. In what follows, I will attempt to clarify the reason for my decision more.
One imperative reason coming to mind at first is that they need to have more fun in their life. At first glance, it's conspicuous that in this kind of family, the children have more different classes to pass the time that their family can't allocate to them. this maybe causes some difficulties for them and in this situation, they need to have some fun with their parents to have enough energy in order to handle it. Perhaps, More specific and firsthand experience can shed more light on the matter. I want to take back you a few years ago when I was 10. in that time, I had the best fun time with my parents. Not only can it create the best memorize for me, but also it helped to build the best relationship between us.
Another interesting point that deserves some words here is that this fun time motivate them to have near and intimate relationship with their parents. it can help them for future of their lives. In order to illustrate, a rather recent yet substantially important social study conducted at the University of Tehran can be pointed out. The researchers found out that the more intimate atmosphere that children have with their parents the less depression they will experience in future.
To wrap it all up, all the aforementioned idea leads us to the conclusion that it's better for the family to allocate their limit time for children to experience more fun with them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 235, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...sses to pass the time that their family cant allocate to them. this maybe causes som...
^^^^
Line 4, column 258, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...hat their family cant allocate to them. this maybe causes some difficulties for them...
^^^^
Line 4, column 555, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...back you a few years ago when I was 10. in that time, I had the best fun time with...
^^
Line 5, column 151, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...timate relationship with their parents. it can help them for future of their lives...
^^
Line 5, column 473, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...he less depression they will experience in future. To wrap it all up, all the aforementi...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, for instance, kind of, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 68.0 43.0788530466 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1969.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 428.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60046728972 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49787554943 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.467289719626 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 612.9 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7464463195 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.7619047619 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.380952381 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.14285714286 5.45110844103 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310003201487 0.236089414692 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106650538405 0.076458572812 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0954077009212 0.0737576698707 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171480230975 0.150856017488 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0863216134111 0.0645574589148 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.25 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.