In view of the reading, the author enumerates that there are some archaeologists who believe the European silver coin, which has been known as the result of coming European explorer (Norse), is fake, by pointing out 3 reasons of support. Finding the statements arguable, the lecturer cast doubts on the claim made by the article and presents some evidence in contrary.
At first, The author argues that so far is the distance of Maine as location of Native Americans and eastern Canada as a settlement of Norse, that it could never happen any connection between them. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that there are some historical documents from people who live in the Maine which show the interest of them to getting many unknown object from far away.
In addition, the reading passage holds the view that there are any other coins have been found in the settlement of the Norse. So, it is clear that the Norse did not brought any coins with themselves. On the other hand, the lecturer disputes this point by clarifying the fact that it is not nessesarily true imagination since they cuold get back the coins into Europe when they have come back.
Finally, the author asserts lack of any document about using European coins as the last point for supporting the fake silver coin. The lecturer, though, dismisses it by saying that so appealing were the silver coins that people can use it as the jwellery. With this in mind, it could conceivable that people used it as money to trade.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 167, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'bring'
Suggestion: bring
... So, it is clear that the Norse did not brought any coins with themselves. On the other...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, first, if, so, well, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1245.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 260.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78846153846 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40727140582 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573076923077 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 380.7 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.4226603746 49.2860985944 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.5 110.228320801 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 21.698381199 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.06452816374 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.423338675502 0.272083759551 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154901324957 0.0996497079465 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0756961299041 0.0662205650399 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227360081543 0.162205337803 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403407558929 0.0443174109184 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.