There is no shortage of depate whether teachers were more valued by the vast of the majority in the past then they are in these days. I personaly think that this claim is complately true. Also, scientists demonstrate us that being teacher was considered by people as a reputable job in the past. Altought, teachers are still valuable people for most of the people, I believe they were more appreciated in the past decades.
To begin with, being a teacher lost it’s reputation in today’s world. Because it is easier to reach the information in this contemporary world. Comparing this circumstances with past centruies, teachers were the only people that you could learn something. Therefore, most of the people can learn their subject from lots of sources such as internet. You can click just one button and get what you want to see. The result of this lead people to do not require a teacher to get the information. Another example is online-courses. In technology world, people began to handle their needs easier and this lead the job less valuable.
Furthermore, with the increasing demand to the technology, lots of new job opportunities occured. This situation tend people to do these popular jobs such as data minder, computer scientist etc. After that, the demand for being a teacher has decreased. People’s choices has changed to these areas and this lead the job less valuable and made other jobs more valuale. So the appreciation for teacher’s has decline very significantly.
To conclude with, reaching information is not that much difficult comparing with past. So people do not need a teacher to learn something. Also there are lots of new jobs that takes people’s interest. With these reasons the reputation of being teacher is not like in the past decades.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 81, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...pos;s reputation in today's world. Because it is easier to reach the information i...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 140, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... not need a teacher to learn something. Also there are lots of new jobs that takes p...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, still, then, therefore, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1509.0 1977.66487455 76% => OK
No of words: 298.0 407.700716846 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06375838926 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87602687082 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 212.727598566 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513422818792 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 618.680645161 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.5947840491 48.9658058833 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 71.8571428571 100.406767564 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.1904761905 20.6045352989 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 5.45110844103 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18621189912 0.236089414692 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0629501383268 0.076458572812 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553541632275 0.0737576698707 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133457501581 0.150856017488 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0531499668229 0.0645574589148 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 11.7677419355 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 58.1214874552 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.