TPO-42 - Independent Writing Task Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Since people spend the majority of their time working, job satisfaction affects different aspects of their lives. To do a repetitive task is the last thing any person prefer to do as a job. In my view, due to a variety of reasons such as the importance of having an enjoyable time at work, feeling efficient and useful and expanding different skills, workers prefer to deal with various types of tasks rather than repeating the same job during workdays. The arguments to further discuss this opinion are as follows.

First, repetition is tedious. An employee who has to do the same task all the time loses his/her enthusiasm after a short time, even if it has been her/his dream job. For instance, as a teenager, working in a library and dealing with books was my favorite job. Therefore, I was thinking this job would never make me bored but once I began my work as a librarian my mind totally changed! To do same jobs such as taking orders from students, receiving books, and putting them back in their places became seriously tiresome after only one week. There was no innovation or creativity involved in this task, which made it even more difficult to do. On the other hand, my friend who was working as a teacher assistant in the chemistry lab was highly enjoying her job; from performing interesting scientific experiments to doing research and class presentations, each day was a whole new story for her! As I compare our experience of working, it is obvious that repetition kills incentives in working and turns it to an unbearable routine.

Moreover, once an employee enjoys working, the efficiency will be higher. In fact, joy is one of the major factors in working which helps people feel what they do is useful and beneficial for them. Back to my working experience as a librarian, I had the feeling that what I was doing was not beneficial since I learned almost nothing new from it. Despite what I was thinking before, I did not have enough time to read books at work although I was spending my whole day in a library. These feelings were highly affecting my job efficiency as well. Therefore, I was reluctant to be at work on time or care to do my tasks carefully and put books in their original place! Thus, it is very important to enjoy your work and be efficient and when you find your job extremely boring and repetitive, It seems impossible.

Finally, dealing with different tasks enables the workers to increase their expertise in different fields. For example, my TA friend gained invaluable experience while working in the lab since she had to perform technical experiments as well as research. Therefore, she learned how to work with different lab facilities as well as working with software for data analysis and research studies.

To sum up, based on the arguments explored above and my personal experience, since having a variety of tasks to do enables employees to enjoy working and do tasks more efficiently. Besides that, it helps them be more versatile in dealing with different duties and gaining experience in different fields. In my opinion, these factors increase job satisfaction among workers to some extent.

Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, finally, first, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, while, as to, for example, for instance, in fact, such as, as well as, in my opinion, in my view, to sum up, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 60.0 43.0788530466 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 73.0 52.1666666667 140% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2616.0 1977.66487455 132% => OK
No of words: 543.0 407.700716846 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81767955801 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82725184711 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6850121376 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 270.0 212.727598566 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497237569061 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 819.9 618.680645161 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 84.170981533 48.9658058833 172% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.909090909 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6818181818 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.95454545455 5.45110844103 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182213848869 0.236089414692 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620583427438 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0660771267436 0.0737576698707 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124933142388 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0495478571854 0.0645574589148 77% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.