TPO-42 - Independent Writing Task Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Today, a prevalent statement we hear a lot is that workers will be more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long because in this case, they will less likely to find their job boring. A considerable number of opponents, however, aruge that keeping changing type of task in a workday will lower their efficiency and the sense of achievement. As far as I am concerned, the latter view seems to align more with my perspective. Several reasons will support my point of view while the following two will suffice here.

To begin with, I think most of us have the feeling that the first and last twenty to thirty minutes of our work period for a certain task is less efficient than the middle part of this period. This is because we need some time to calm down and focus at the begining of a task and we are also more likely to be distacted near the end of it. For this reason, keeping changing tasks in a workday will make it impossible for us to work efficiently, which means that we may spend even more time on each task averagely. On the contrary, if we prolong the time we spend on each task by doing only one or two tasks a day, we could prolong the efficient periods, too.

For another, there is no doubt that to do a better job, we need to think deeper. If we always change the type of our tasks, we will be superficial at each tasks. To be specifical, if a student is asked to changing the subjects he is reviewing for final examination every half an hour, no doubt he could not remember the poems he has read or could not figure out the math question for the lack of deep thinking. What's more, when we do tasks that are similar to each others, it is more possible for us to find the connection between them and view them in a higher and boarder lever. Taking study as an example, again. As we all know, mathematics origins from physics, that is, the former is the abstraction of the latter. If a student does this two subjects in a schoolday, he may find the connection between them, which may give him a sense of achievement and inspire him to keep exploring.

Admittedly, a minority of individuals tend tos believe that doing similar tasks all days long will be boring and chaging the types may refresh people's mind. However, as we all know, all the famous sicentists keep working on the same project for most of their life. Only with this amazing patience could they achieve great success in the exploration of nature. Whats' more, it will be enjoyable instead of boring for us when we could dig into a task and have a deep understanding of it.

For the reasons above, I disagree with the statement.

Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 98, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...s will be more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday...
Line 5, column 412, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...question for the lack of deep thinking. Whats more, when we do tasks that are similar...
Line 7, column 361, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...t success in the exploration of nature. Whats more, it will be enjoyable instead of b...

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, so, while, i think, no doubt, on the contrary, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 60.0 43.0788530466 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2201.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 499.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.41082164329 4.8611393121 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72634191566 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42953389134 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.4749498998 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 677.7 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.9733838269 48.9658058833 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.05 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.95 20.6045352989 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319540909026 0.236089414692 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0959325824939 0.076458572812 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117169191449 0.0737576698707 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187934702921 0.150856017488 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125276817083 0.0645574589148 194% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.59 10.9000537634 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.