Industrial society has brought several influences to people’s life, and with them, the way we currently work. As we know, in the past, workers used to do similar tasks during the whole day of work in the industries, tightening screws behind the screws, reflecting standardized mass production, what ended being called Fordism. However, working doing the same thing can be harmful and demotivating, resulting in illnesses like anxiety and depression, as well as the non-improvement of important skills, like group work and creativity. In light of this, this essay will explain why I think workers are more satisfied when they have different types of tasks.
First, as employees, we are constantly trying to do our job in the best way as possible, because being recognized is something that can improve your work and life quality. Doing different types of tasks enable the workers to keep motivated and engaged on their tasks, what would not occur if they only had the same tasks to do every day. When I used to work as a translator, I only translated documents about chemistry, what with the passing time was starting to become unmotivating and repetitive. However, when I started to work as an administrative assistant, I was able to do several tasks, as translation, answer calls, send e-mails to clients, what made me focus way much more on my tasks and, consequently, making less mistakes.
Second, doing one single task results in an unpleasant routine of work, resulting in unhealth behaviors and illnesses, on the other hand, several tasks require workers to move and be active, creating an engaging environment. When my dad used to work in a pharmaceutical company, due to the amount of repetitive movements he had to do, he constantly complained about feeling pain on his shoulder, having to undergo surgery.
As last, when you only have one task, you can miss important things of work’s environment, like know new people or even thing creatively. Making exactly the same thing unable workers know new people, create solutions or even act proactively, since unforeseen event barely occurs. I remember a day that a new colleague was having issues to administer her tasks and I suggested a solution that changed not only the way she was working, but also gave me the opportunity to know her more, what would not happen if we had only one single task to do.
To sum up, these are one of the many reasons why I think workers are more satisfied when they have different of tasks to do during the workday. Despite the fact that several tasks enable workers to develop different types of skills, it can also make the work a pleasant, motivating and healthy activity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 722, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun mistakes is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...e on my tasks and, consequently, making less mistakes. Second, doing one single ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, second, so, well, i think, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2240.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 452.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95575221239 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61088837703 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81777123913 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535398230088 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 691.2 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 11.0 3.51792114695 313% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.1344086022 149% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.8912837558 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.333333333 100.406767564 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.1333333333 20.6045352989 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46666666667 5.45110844103 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347410708519 0.236089414692 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131787053576 0.076458572812 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117071454387 0.0737576698707 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226247941743 0.150856017488 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.089616135058 0.0645574589148 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 11.7677419355 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.08 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.0537634409 139% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.