There are different standpoints regarding the happiness from the work. Some argue that workers would gain more satisfaction from doing different types of tasks while others hold the opposite idea that to do the same task leads them to be happier. In fact, it is hard to judge and up to the context of the work.
Obviously, the majority of people are reluctant to repeat their action mechanically, because they cannot endure the tediousness created by the same work. Trying to do different types of tasks is beneficial for them to keep the motivation of job and is easy to satisfy themselves with achieving success in varied domains.
Meanwhile, however, other consequences as a result from dissimilar sorts of work are supposed to be taken into account as well.
The different types of tasks would make it impossible for workers to be happy sometimes: they coerce these people to face new challenges and it costs more time to acquaint every kind of tasks which even would be changed definitely in the second day. Except few extremely bold people, a huge number of workers will feel quite stressful when something is completely new for them.
Further, the same type of task doesn’t mean the context of the job is the same. People are likely to suffer from varied kinds of formidableness in the daily work. An architect should do several different plans for one project. Even though they draw a window for one building’s façade, they have to establish dozens of models of windows to match the whole genre. Besides, if their work does not fulfill their customers’ demands, the architects have no choice but to redraw the façade. This type of work on some stage can also be called working repeatedly, whereas the context is definitely different and filled with challenges. It affords the strong happiness when the clients acclaim the work at last. So, I believe that no one will affirm that being an architect is a boring position even though they only do design every day.
Consequently, we have to clarify which reasons lead workers to be happy. How different the type of tasks is unlikely to simply determine how happy workers can be during their workday. If one type of task containing diverse challenges stimulates someone’s motivation, the people would attain likewise pleasure from the work.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
There are different standpoints regardin...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e and up to the context of the work. Obviously, the majority of people are re...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...achieving success in varied domains. Meanwhile, however, other consequences a...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed to be taken into account as well. The different types of tasks would make ...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...omething is completely new for them. Further, the same type of task doesn&apo...
^^
Line 9, column 194, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'several'.
Suggestion: several
... the daily work. An architect should do several different plans for one project. Even though they...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hough they only do design every day. Consequently, we have to clarify which r...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'besides', 'but', 'consequently', 'however', 'if', 'likewise', 'regarding', 'second', 'so', 'well', 'whereas', 'while', 'in fact', 'kind of', 'as a result']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.223234624146 0.229887763892 97% => OK
Verbs: 0.164009111617 0.158761421928 103% => OK
Adjectives: 0.100227790433 0.0866891130778 116% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0546697038724 0.046263068375 118% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0432801822323 0.0685040099705 63% => OK
Prepositions: 0.116173120729 0.118717715034 98% => OK
Participles: 0.0296127562642 0.0351676179071 84% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.92559670004 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0432801822323 0.0309702414327 140% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0933940774487 0.0887237588012 105% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0227790432802 0.0209618222197 109% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0159453302961 0.0139019557991 115% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2362.0 2387.08602151 99% => OK
No of words: 389.0 408.028673835 95% => OK
Chars per words: 6.07197943445 5.86048508987 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.48200974243 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.344473007712 0.338922669872 102% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.246786632391 0.251872472559 98% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.177377892031 0.174417080927 102% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.133676092545 0.112833075102 118% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92559670004 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54498714653 0.524397521467 104% => OK
Word variations: 61.5245401682 59.2087087015 104% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6684587814 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.4736842105 20.5533526081 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6062067128 48.84282405 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.315789474 120.699889404 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4736842105 20.5533526081 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.842105263158 0.644075263715 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.5376344086 132% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.54480286738 126% => OK
Readability: 45.1523474496 45.7405998639 99% => OK
Elegance: 1.40869565217 1.45489161554 97% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341649650649 0.300154397459 114% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0774529589185 0.103427244359 75% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0499044531254 0.0752933317313 66% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.558997833663 0.497263757937 112% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.185422290644 0.151897553556 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129459818545 0.114077575197 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621430212171 0.0781384742642 80% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.277874754579 0.336927656856 82% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.147703266466 0.067059652881 220% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212082109593 0.210909579961 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0678694533004 0.0618886996521 110% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8870967742 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.86379928315 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.91756272401 81% => OK
Positive topic words: 11.0 8.42114695341 131% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 2.4623655914 122% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.75985663082 145% => OK
Total topic words: 18.0 13.6433691756 132% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.