It is very important for companies to increase their productivity. There are some different factors which play an important role in company's productivity. Workers satisfaction is one of the crucial factors in company's productivity. Having many different type of tasks to do is really interesting for workers and will increase their satisfaction at working enviroment. In my opinion, two reasons will cause satisfaction in multi task workers which I will mention in the reminder of this essay.
First, doing similar task all day long, will be boring for workers. Having repetitive schedule in daily life, will cause disappointment in people. Because they will not have enthusiasm in their work and they know that they will do the same things over and over. Hecne, it is very important for companies to increase the enthusiasm in their workers. One way for for achieving this, is doing unpredictable activities in one day. Doing similar tasks will also reduce the adaptiveness of workers. For instance, imagine a car which used to work on hot places for a long time. if someone wants to use the car in cold weather, it will not work properly. Because, the car missed its adaptiveness.
Second, doing new task is really interesting for workers. People always tend to start new task because they are very interested to have new experiences. Because, in experiences new task, people will face new challenges. For example, when I was in high school, I used to review the topics on my math lesson before teacher and I was really interested to engage with some topics which I heard about them. Hence, this a tendancy in people to experience new tasks.
In conclusion, Having different types of tasks to do will increase productivity of the workers and also will increase productivity of the whole company. There are two reasons that play and important role in this idea. These are increasing enthusiasm and experiencing new challenges. In my idea, if a company consider these items, it will increase its productivity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 240, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...actors in companys productivity. Having many different type of tasks to do is really interesti...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mention in the reminder of this essay. First, doing similar task all day long, ...
^^
Line 2, column 359, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: for
...he enthusiasm in their workers. One way for for achieving this, is doing unpredictable ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 573, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
... to work on hot places for a long time. if someone wants to use the car in cold we...
^^
Line 2, column 649, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...old weather, it will not work properly. Because, the car missed its adaptiveness. Se...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ause, the car missed its adaptiveness. Second, doing new task is really interes...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ncy in people to experience new tasks. In conclusion, Having different types of...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, if, really, second, so, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1679.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 334.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02694610778 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89071042275 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 212.727598566 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.461077844311 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 531.9 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.8517319923 48.9658058833 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.0 100.406767564 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.5217391304 20.6045352989 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5652173913 5.45110844103 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226562290317 0.236089414692 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.072317261611 0.076458572812 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0793074163424 0.0737576698707 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141628266372 0.150856017488 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.02756840886 0.0645574589148 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 11.7677419355 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.1575268817 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.3 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 86.8835125448 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.