TPO-48 - Integrated Writing Task In recent years, many frog species around the world have declined in numbers or even gone extinct due to changes in their environment. These population declines and extinctions have serious consequences for the ecosystems

Many frogs species around the world have declined in number or gone extinct in last years. The reading passage indicates some reasons for declining frog population and offeres some method for solving the problem. The lecturer, nonetheless, throws doubts on all method and reasons presented in the reading passage and offers some counterclaims to refute them all.
First, the author argues that using pesticides are making this problem. The reading passage claims that pesticides kill insects and threates frog population and prohibiting pesticides is the best way to solve this problem. Conversely, the lecturer claims that prohibiting pesticides is not equnomically fair. Because farmers use pesticides to decrease crop losses and prohibiting pesticides will make lots of problem for farmers in their economy.
Furthermore, the reading passage highlights that skin fungus is another reason that causes problem for frogs. Infected frogs die because of dehydration. The reading passage thinks that researchers can protect frogs by using new treatments. In contrast, The speaker thinks that new treatment must applied indivisually and it would be so hard and expensive. Additionally, she claims that treatment doesn't pass to off-springs and researchers need to apply treatments on the next generation again.
Finally, the author brings up the idea that human activities cause declining in frog population. Because human are draining wetlands and rivers by excessive use of water. Wetlands are the main habitats of frogs. The professor, on the contary, thinks that global warming is the biggest threat for this problem. It is unlikely that excessive use of water causes this problem.

Votes
Average: 8.1 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...some counterclaims to refute them all. First, the author argues that using pest...
^^
Line 2, column 403, Rule ID: LOTS_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun problem seems to be countable; consider using: 'lots of problems'.
Suggestion: lots of problems
...es and prohibiting pesticides will make lots of problem for farmers in their economy. Furthe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... problem for farmers in their economy. Furthermore, the reading passage highlig...
^^
Line 3, column 398, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...Additionally, she claims that treatment doesnt pass to off-springs and researchers nee...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eatments on the next generation again. Finally, the author brings up the idea t...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, first, furthermore, nonetheless, so, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1426.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 258.0 270.72406181 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52713178295 5.08290768461 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76922184522 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550387596899 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 419.366225166 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.2065987522 49.2860985944 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.8823529412 110.228320801 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1764705882 21.698381199 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.05882352941 7.06452816374 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 4.45695364238 247% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.387876270712 0.272083759551 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130628482177 0.0996497079465 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0908732894263 0.0662205650399 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221841117033 0.162205337803 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0208527863545 0.0443174109184 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.8541721854 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.2 12.2367328918 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.