Archaeologists found clay jars in Iraq that has been excavated by village people two years earlier. The vessels in these jars may refers to creating electricity by using batteries. The reading passage thinks that there are some reasons that contradict with the idea of generating electricity. But the lecturer thinks that passage's ideas aren't convincing.
The reading passage mentions that archaeologists didn't find any metal wires near the excavation site. Ancient people will need some conductors for using electricity. But the lecturer thinks that maybe local people didn't recognize the importance of conductors and put them away.
The reading passage mentions that copper cylinders inside of jars is exactly like copper cylinder that used for holding scrolls of sacred texts and these jars were not used for electricity. But according to lecturer this doesn't prove anything and they may used copper and iron to produce electricity.
Finally, the reading passage mentions that ancient people didn't need to use electricity. Because, they didn't have any equipments that needed electricity. But the lecturer thinks that they may used electricity as an invisible power for shocking and also medical applications. Like healing and muscle reflection and etc.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 338, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...the lecturer thinks that passages ideas arent convincing. The reading passage ment...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... that passages ideas arent convincing. The reading passage mentions that archae...
^^
Line 2, column 52, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ng passage mentions that archaeologists didnt find any metal wires near the excavatio...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 216, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...lecturer thinks that maybe local people didnt recognize the importance of conductors ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tance of conductors and put them away. The reading passage mentions that copper...
^^
Line 3, column 223, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...tricity. But according to lecturer this doesnt prove anything and they may used copper...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...opper and iron to produce electricity. Finally, the reading passage mentions th...
^^
Line 4, column 61, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ng passage mentions that ancient people didnt need to use electricity. Because, they ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 91, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...t people didnt need to use electricity. Because, they didnt have any equipments that ne...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 105, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... need to use electricity. Because, they didnt have any equipments that needed electri...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 312, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...ons. Like healing and muscle reflection and etc.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, may, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 30.3222958057 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1065.0 1373.03311258 78% => OK
No of words: 194.0 270.72406181 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48969072165 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73029028997 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 145.348785872 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551546391753 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 330.3 419.366225166 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.48247338 49.2860985944 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.9230769231 110.228320801 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9230769231 21.698381199 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.07692307692 7.06452816374 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 4.19205298013 262% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364953562071 0.272083759551 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121637884983 0.0996497079465 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0911135755968 0.0662205650399 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217206604756 0.162205337803 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0784422639296 0.0443174109184 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.3589403974 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.97 12.2367328918 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.