Hail pellets is one of the dangrous things that threat farmers. Cloud seeding, which uses silver idiods, is the common method to change hail pellet into harmless rain or snow. The reading passage presents some reasons that indicate effectiveness of using cloud seeding. The lecturer, nonetheless, throws doubt on all reasons presented in reading passage and offers some counterclaims to refute them all.
First, the author argues that using cloud seeding has great results in laboratory experiments. The author thinks this idea can be expanded to real life. Conversely, the lecturer takes the view that laboratory results don't guarantee anyrhing for real life. Additionally, using cloud seeding will increase risk of drought and lack of water.
Furthermore, the reading passage highlights the thought that using cloud seeding had great results in Asia to control the precipitation in urban areas. This suggest that it might be effective in protecting farms in the U.S. The professor, on the contary, thinks that air pollution helpes cloud seeding in urban areas by creating favorable situation and cloud seeding will not work in urban areas.
Finally, the author brings up the idea that cloud seeding was tested in a few local regions of United States and reduced hail damage. In contrast, the lecturer thinks other reasons played important roles in the reduction of damage. Because, this reduction happend in other regions that cloud seeding never used. Maybe, it was because of national variations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...some counterclaims to refute them all. First, the author argues that using clou...
^^
Line 2, column 219, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... takes the view that laboratory results dont guarantee anyrhing for real life. Addit...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ase risk of drought and lack of water. Furthermore, the reading passage highlig...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... seeding will not work in urban areas. Finally, the author brings up the idea t...
^^
Line 4, column 234, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...rtant roles in the reduction of damage. Because, this reduction happend in other region...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, first, furthermore, if, may, nonetheless, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1266.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 238.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31932773109 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55478769917 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575630252101 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 371.7 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.9866052739 49.2860985944 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.4285714286 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 7.06452816374 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.039127703051 0.272083759551 14% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0154869478321 0.0996497079465 16% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0221246763219 0.0662205650399 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0247546743743 0.162205337803 15% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00855338255603 0.0443174109184 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.