Making decision in critical moments is one of the most important decision in every individuals' life because it might either make them big problems or take them in the right direction. If people act without thinking and evaluating all aspects of their situation, they are less likely to be not only successful but also be respected in amongst others. Speaking of a critical situations, namely, making mistake by someone who is about talking for a number of audiances, where our instantanous decision is compulsory, requires lots of discussion. In this regard, people may have three choices whether interrupt and correcting the mistake, or, notice him after presentation, or, most unliklely, say nothing. As a matter of fact, I think the second solution is more feasible. In what follows, I will explore my point of view on this issue.
The first exquisite reason to be mentioned is that interrupting the speaker is a kind of rude behavior which indicates our irrespective manner. Not only would speaker be sad about it but also it is more likely to forget what was he supposed to say. For instance, once I was in mathematic class. Unfortunately, the professor had recently lost his father and he did not have enough concentration on materials, so he constantly made some mistakes in writing wrong numbers and furmulas. On of my classmates started telling his mistakes. After all, the professor became frustrated and finished the class earlier becuase he lost the clues. If I were my classmate, I would not have such embarrasing thing.
Another subtle point to be mentioned is that there would be more time to think about mistakes if one waits until the class or meeting is over. It is possible that sometimes audiances are wrong and misunderstand some concepts. Sometimes, students concieve the material conversely and after the lecture goes on, they may find out that it was not that they had thought before. For one thing, some materials sometimes are extremely difficult and have tricks. But after thinking about them, it turns out that they were correct. In addition, after class, there would be plenty time to discusse about the problematice issues.
To put it briefly, contemplating all reasons, one soon realizes that the second way is more rational since it is not only respectful means to assert our point of view but also it is possible that a misconception has accured and the mistake is not actually a real mistake. In addition, more time for thinking is better than hasty decision and blowing every thing up. Thus, I recommend that audiances wait until they have enough time after speech if they had such similar condition.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 84, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...of the most important decision in every individuals life because it might either make them ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 374, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'situation'?
Suggestion: situation
... amongst others. Speaking of a critical situations, namely, making mistake by someone who ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 405, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'sometimes' is usually put after the verb 'are'.
Suggestion: are sometimes
...t before. For one thing, some materials sometimes are extremely difficult and have tricks. Bu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, briefly, but, conversely, first, if, may, second, so, thus, after all, for instance, i think, in addition, kind of, speaking of, as a matter of fact, for one thing
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 15.1003584229 199% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2202.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 443.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97065462754 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75221608422 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537246049661 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 694.8 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2295509203 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.090909091 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1363636364 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.13636363636 5.45110844103 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.85842293907 311% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0664179957073 0.236089414692 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0186567353618 0.076458572812 24% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0196619602541 0.0737576698707 27% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0409078519116 0.150856017488 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0116476309373 0.0645574589148 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.