It is quite often that when attending a class or a meeting, we may find that what the speaker states is inaccurate or with some errors. We would struggle on whether to point out the mistakes immediately, or simply keep mute. From my perspective, I would choose to talk to the speaker after the class or meeting.
The reason why I am not willing to point out the inaccuracy during the class or meeting is that the speaker may feel embarrassed when being interrupted. Also, the sudden interruption might cause unexpected disorder and unnecessary discussions, which would impede the normal progress of the class or meeting. Once I was in a biology class, and all the students were carefully listening to the professor. When we came to analyze a new creature, the professor defined it as a reptile, which is actually a mammal. Whit no hesitation, I pointed out the mistake made by the professor. It turned out that the professor felt so embarrassed when being challenged in front of many people. It seems that a more euphemistic and roundabout way might be a better choice.
In addition, saying nothing is no better than indicating the mistake immediately. It is very likely that other people in the class or meeting might be misled by unrecognized mistakes, leading to undesirable consequences. For instance, in a budget meeting, my cousin found out that there were some minor mistakes for the calculation of the fixed costs, but he did not point out it. And his silence caused huge lost for the whole project because miscalculated fixed costs led the whole team to set an inappropriate initial price. Obviously, keeping silence is not a better choice.
Admittedly, saying nothing seems to be the most plausible choice: it brings no embarrassment; it does not require you to conduct discussion with the speaker. However, as what have been mentioned above, many undesirable consequences would be caused due to that kind of silence. Also, by pointing out the mistakes to the speaker afterwards, both you and the speaker can benefit through deep discussion and broadened view about issue. In general, pointing out the mistakes afterwards is a better choice.
Above these reasons I have listed, I think strongly that it is wise to have a talk about the mistakes made in the class or the meeting with the teacher or leader in person afterwards.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 527, Rule ID: SAY_TELL[2]
Message: 'Say' cannot be followed by a direct personal object. Did you mean 'told'?
Suggestion: told
...cher made a mistake. I rose my hand and said her it was incorrect. After that, we di...
^^^^
Line 6, column 689, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'nobody'?
Suggestion: nobody
...at both of the formula were correct and no body made a mistake. As you can see, by corr...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, may, second, so, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 60.0 43.0788530466 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1838.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 388.0 407.700716846 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73711340206 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52824936481 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.448453608247 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 563.4 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.7139528356 48.9658058833 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.5238095238 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4761904762 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 5.45110844103 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.85842293907 311% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221623547629 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0685068027135 0.076458572812 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0641046514485 0.0737576698707 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145003229468 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0323014317101 0.0645574589148 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 11.7677419355 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.65 8.01818996416 83% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 86.8835125448 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.