Nowadays, every individual tries to make some friendships in order to gain happiness and prevent from being lonely. Regardless this concept, a controversial question is raised what kind of relationships is more effective, friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time or making many new friends? From my perspective, friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time can be more influential for people’s happiness. I will elaborate on my point through two outstanding reasons.
The first and foremost reason is that people in deep friendship are more reliable. These individuals can talk about their weakness and strength to each other. They always feel comfortable and peacefully due to existence someone in their lives. When they face to some problems, they believe and confident themselves. Furthermore, they would be less anxious and worried and consequently happier in their lives. For instance, I have a perfect friendship with two best persons in my life from 8 years ago. We always support each other in different situations; in painful or happy events. So, I never feel lonely. We know all things about each other and we understand which mood other one has. As you can see, deep friendship brings reliability and dependency and then happy feeling in rest of life.
The second reason that to be mentioned is that in firm friendships people have less conflict with others. They know each other due to long period time’s relationship and also they know thoughts and beliefs of each other. Furthermore, they have less different notion and conflicts. So, they do not make each other upset and worry. For example, my father told me about his friendship in the past. He stated that he and his friends had few different ideas about different subjects; so, they often decided very well and in short time. Also, everyone accepted the decision without any harmful discussion. If we have long duration friendships we would have perfect time without any sadness and painful occurrences.
To put it briefly, long period time’s friendships have more influences on our feelings such as happiness due to reliability and less confliction between individuals. Lastly, conducting more surveys in this field could be recommended to reveal more precise outcomes of friendships and their effects on our feeling.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 240, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...ips is more effective, friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time or ma...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 277, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...th a small number of people over a long period of time or making many new friends? From my per...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 358, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...? From my perspective, friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time can b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 395, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...th a small number of people over a long period of time can be more influential for people&apos...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, consequently, first, furthermore, if, lastly, second, so, then, well, for example, for instance, in short, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1989.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 383.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19321148825 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86437851719 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537859007833 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.7722683956 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.875 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9583333333 20.6045352989 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 11.8709677419 168% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236011859799 0.236089414692 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0661106459676 0.076458572812 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0879332327134 0.0737576698707 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166152166565 0.150856017488 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107456302318 0.0645574589148 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.