Without a shadow of the doubt, there are some important factors or consideration everyone must take into the account during their presentations and when they address the large audience. Not surprisingly, there are a number of debates and discussion are overwhelming the topic. In my opinion, when you are in a meeting and someone rectifies your mistake, you should talk to the person later on. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First and foremost, learning is the key to success, we should always learn from our mistakes in order to get achieve our desired goal. When you are talking in a group and someone finds a mistake in your opinion, first you should listen to the person if he is accurate or not. After that, you answer the things appropriately. My own experience is a compelling example of this, last year, I had started a moment for the oral health because I am a dentist by profession, so I was presenting a topic related to our oral health. Same time I was working with a research scholar, who find amazing things about our periodontal health and present article in the international dental conference. It was very interesting fact that our oral health is also related to our other systems like cardiovascular and gastrointestinal when I talked about this, one of the dentists interrupt me to state that this is no relevant information. When I finished my lecture, I showed him evidence to justify my talk and he was agreed. So, we should wait and talk patiently on the topic.
Secondly, when someone interrupts you during your presentation, it can distract you from your topic. Because you need a remarkable confidence, while you are addressing the professional from the same field. They had so many doubts and debates regarding the same topic, if you immediately listen to them and start to rectify the things, might be you could forget the main idea of your topic and the important information you have to deliver in that time period, could be missed. Therefore, whenever I do my speeches on the professional or social issues, I always mention that if someone had questions and doubts in my article, please ask me at the end of my presentation and I keep two minutes spare to clarify the mistakes and my belief.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that patience and listen to others and relate their views and reply later on, are the good points of the good speaker, which makes their speeches influential.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, i feel, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 69.0 43.0788530466 160% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2047.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 427.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79391100703 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81871497133 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531615925059 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 639.0 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.3736161435 48.9658058833 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.411764706 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1176470588 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11764705882 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121557251928 0.236089414692 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0451717447432 0.076458572812 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470981486018 0.0737576698707 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0725767432006 0.150856017488 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349051206886 0.0645574589148 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.