Throughout the history of mankind, leaders and managers had the great duty of leading their group, and make the best way to get their team work together. The key to success for any group, participating in any kind of activity, is the true cooperation. Meanwhile, as leaders are just humans like others, they might make mistakes. In this case, some prefer interrupting and correcting the leader right away, while other prefer to wait until the end of the meeting and share their opinion with leader privately. I, based on my own experience, strongly believe the best way is to wait and tell the leader about the mistake later on account of reasons, which three of them are mentioned bellow:
The first important reason is to maintain coherence of group. Leadership is the most important role in any kind of group activity. Napoleon Bonaparte, the emperor of France once said that "An army of goats led by a lion can defeat an army of lions led by a goat." Interrupting and correcting leader of the group, might creates doubt of inefficiency of the leader among group members, which can lead them to disobey leader and eventually, chaotic situation comes out of nowhere. For example, I used to play for football team of university. Once, the coach made an obvious mistake in team arrangement, immediately after arrangement announced, one of players complained about it toughly and shouted over the coach. Even though the mentioned player was eliminated from the arrangement immediately, other players started to disobey coach's plans, which resulted in losing the game.
Furthermore, hearing plans or facts which oppose my own idea, does not necessarily mean to be wrong ones. Much more time need to be spent on contemplating about the leader's strategies or notions and after that, if there were any questions left, those questions could be asked from the leader. In this way, we can make sure that, no misconception exist. For example, once I interrupted my friend who was in charge of a group activity, immediately I found out that I was misunderstood and he was right.
Additionally, interrupting once while speaking, might cause him or her to lose his or her concentration and cannot focus on the rest of his or her speech. On the other hand, interrupting the person while speaking is considered as some kind of impolite behavior, which is hard to tolerate.
In conclusion, by all this taken into account, I intensively support the idea of being patient for a good time to talk to leader about his or her mistake. This altitude can result in more cohesion in group and creation of a respect-based relation among the group members, which is central thing to reach the best success in any kind of group activity.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, so, while, for example, in conclusion, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 52.1666666667 142% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2276.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 462.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92640692641 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63618218583 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78745190461 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536796536797 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 700.2 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.7579991552 48.9658058833 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.444444444 100.406767564 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6666666667 20.6045352989 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94444444444 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13434021913 0.236089414692 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0390375318287 0.076458572812 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412359878992 0.0737576698707 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0746701560263 0.150856017488 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403838136021 0.0645574589148 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.