People have different approach in behaving in front of a mistake. I think the reaction is depend on the condition and in any condition and the importance of mistake and the formality and attendance of the meeting and who is making mistake. I think in different situation each of the reactions provided in the question would be appropriate.
First, interupting and correcting rightaway is not the best approach as it sometimes makes people defensive and feeling disrespect. If the mistake is very important and there is not any other opprtunity to correct the person I think by asking question and ellaboration instead of confrontation we can elaborate and correct the person. In this way nobody will get hurt.
Also, waiting until the end of meeting and talking in person is a very good way of communication and making rapport. However, sometimes waiting to the end provide significant harm to audience due to misinformation, following correction emails for attendance could sometimes reduce this misinformation. Therefore, this kind of communication provides more respect and less defensive behavior and more acceptable.
Lastly, saying nothing is not a good approach unless the mistake is not big or important and not saying anything could be worthwhile. For instance, if the presenter show the slide and say something by mistake it might not be such a big deal and usually everybody underestands that mistake was unintentional and was just mistake in reading. However, I think we learn by our mistake and receiving feedbacks are part of our improvement and growth. Therefore, in other cases I prefer to receive feedback and be corrected and others might think like that too. So, in the case of very careless and not important mistakes we might consider just ignorance which does not harm anybody and anything. In other situations I think saying nothing is not a favor and it is a good idea to correct people but respect and nonjudgmental behavior would be the best appropriate approach.
In conclusion, we might behave different in response to mistakes. It depends on the type of mistake and the importance of it and also the place of happening and the formality of the meeting. I think the second approach usually work better in most cases because produces less defensive behavior and more respect.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 91, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'depended'.
Suggestion: depended
...t of a mistake. I think the reaction is depend on the condition and in any condition a...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, lastly, second, so, therefore, while, for instance, i think, in conclusion, kind of, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 32.0 13.8261648746 231% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.0752688172 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1927.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 380.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07105263158 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96561434125 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.465789473684 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 612.0 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1131525653 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.055555556 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1111111111 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 5.45110844103 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122199812537 0.236089414692 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0371815498548 0.076458572812 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0315424324065 0.0737576698707 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0615653388519 0.150856017488 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0331024756041 0.0645574589148 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.