Some people believe that in the post-informational society it is impossible to live without a personal schedule. This viewpoint also considers a necessity for young people to plan their activities and matches my opinion. I contend that daily planning helps youngsters to focus on the most essential tasks, to complete their work more efficiently and to become more self-disciplined.
The primary argument states that with multiple information channels it has become more difficult for young people to keep focused on a certain point. The range of information sources has expanded and, simultaneously, it generated a “trash” in news flows that may distract person’s attention. For example, when I was finishing secondary school, I could not concentrate on exam preparation because of informational war between Ukraine and Russia. Every piece of news was widely discussed by my classmates and it demanded great efforts to stay focused on studying. Therefore, the development of a plan with specified tasks would assist me in studying process.
Another statement for organization of daily activity is about fighting the addiction on social networks. With a carefully planned schedule, it will be easier for a young student to perform the home tasks instead of uncontrolled chatting in messengers. To illustrate this, we can take my case about TOEFL preparation. The less days left to the exam date, the more nervous I became, though I could not entirely focus on preparation because of Facebook addition. To overcome that, I prioritized TOEFL exercises and allocated them by time, implying that I could network only during the breaks between exercises. Consequently, there was an outside incentive for me in kind of a plan to complete the tasks.
The final advantage of planning for young people lies in developing self-discipline. Assuming that a man plans something, we can state that he takes control under own activity and restricts himself to the number of tasks he should firstly do. For instance, a close friend of mine has won a recognized CFA contest due to the properly developed schedule. She desecrated to preparation four hours every day, and with such a severe organization became a lot more disciplined than she was before the contest. In this way, putting yourself into frames helps to improve the resilience and persistence in a daily performance.
In conclusion, it is necessary for young people to schedule their everyday activity and manage their time. Such an organization is helpful in focusing, motivating for work completion and becoming more self-disciplined. These traits are crucially important for everyone who strives to succeed in the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 230, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...anded and, simultaneously, it generated a 'trash' in news flows that ma...
^
Line 3, column 321, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun days is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ke my case about TOEFL preparation. The less days left to the exam date, the more ne...
^^^^
Line 3, column 663, Rule ID: KIND_OF_A[1]
Message: Don't include 'a' after a classification term. Use simply 'kind of'.
Suggestion: kind of
...here was an outside incentive for me in kind of a plan to complete the tasks. The final ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, if, may, second, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2266.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 425.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33176470588 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19065590766 2.67179642975 119% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 212.727598566 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581176470588 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 719.1 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.7296943801 48.9658058833 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.0 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3181818182 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.31818181818 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182961205785 0.236089414692 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.053506483682 0.076458572812 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.045975341773 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104907567821 0.150856017488 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0109692559866 0.0645574589148 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 86.8835125448 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.