Since the dawn of civilization and industrialization, governments are always confronting with various kinds of puzzles for making decisions. There are lots of different areas which governments should pay money for their improvement. There is a drastic contrast between people on whether it is better to spend money on internet access or on public transportation. While it is contradicted by many that it is the best notion to expend money on internet access improvement, I incline to believe that considering financial aid to improve internet access in more substantial than transportation. I will state some robust reasons to support my claim.
In my opinion, the first and most crucial reason is that nowadays the vast amounts of activities all around the world are facilitated by utilizing internet. For instances, the majority of task and activities which people need to do are based on internet. Also taking online courses are increasing gradually between students. In the majority of cases, hard copies are altered by online books and it is an undebated fact that libraries are going to disappear in near future and online libraries would take their place. To illustrate more, I will state an example based on my experience. I cannot remember the last time I bought a paper book, I have bought just electronic books recently. The things that have said indicate the growing important role of internet and how internet is spreading all around the world. So, it can be inferred that government should consider large amounts of money on internet access improvement.
Furthermore, another reason which has to be considered is that enhancing people's access to internet can help other areas too. Internet access would strongly affect transportation quality. For instance, nowadays there are great numbers of online software and application which people can exert them to take taxies like Uber and Snapp and there is a growing interest between people to use these Apps. As a tangible example, a research undertaken by the University of Ottawa has asserted that people's amount of satisfaction of transportation is positively correlated with how often they use online applications for transportation.
Drawing upon the reasons -- increasing internet-based tasks-- and -- net effects on other areas-- although there are always some exceptions which are excluded from the general rule, I am to a large extent on the belief it is better that governments devote their financial budgets on internet access improvements. I profoundly adhere to this idea that net access improvement would help other areas improvement too.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 256, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...eople need to do are based on internet. Also taking online courses are increasing gr...
^^^^
Line 5, column 629, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...online applications for transportation. Drawing upon the reasons -- increasing i...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 392, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'areas'' or 'area's'?
Suggestion: areas'; area's
...net access improvement would help other areas improvement too.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, so, while, as to, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2206.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 415.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3156626506 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0225151772 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520481927711 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 698.4 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.10482972 48.9658058833 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.105263158 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8421052632 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.94736842105 5.45110844103 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268013945339 0.236089414692 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0808220703303 0.076458572812 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561145525534 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167239365054 0.150856017488 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0805860008097 0.0645574589148 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.