Nowadays, it is commonly accepted that people highly expected for governments for more investment in athletics, because the success of sports teams brought happiness for the whole of society. So, most people believe that financing in athletics is preferred to art. Contrary to this popular belief, there are still those who argue that art demonstrate the cultural values of each society, thus governments should have specific attention to it and provide more budget in order to power it. However, I, to a great extent, disagree with this idea that governments should spend more money in support of arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams.
First and foremost, sports teams are the most important entertainment for all social classes in societies. People from upper-level to poor class of society like sports teams and follow them. Sports events such as Olympic or world cups excited their advocates in the world. This widespread interest creates a lot of related jobs and money cycle in different countries. Therefore, investment in this field not only provide happiness and positive atmosphere in societies, but also increased job opportunity and welfare in countries.
Another significant fact that should be taken into consideration is that governments aid from sports encourages people to attend to more exercise and rise of healthy in society. The interest and thrill are created by professional athletes, motivate common people for sport. For example, after I read a biography of Laila Esfandiary, a famous woman rock climber in Iran, I started rock climbing. Last year I was successful to win the sports award from the university.
Finally, yet importantly, someone believes that lake of governments support from art is the main reason that put art in difficulty in recent years. Nonetheless, this view is not true. First, arts are losing attention, because of low-quality artworks and weakness in techniques and it does not case by weak financial support. For instance, when I go to the art galleries it is very rare to see an impressive painting. Second, the number of artists who sought for the beauty of artworks declined and most artist just try to make more money.
On the basis of reasons that were mentioned above, I am convinced that governments should spend more money in support of athletics than the support of art. Because athletics increase happiness and physical health in societies and because more investment in art cannot solve the problem of today's art industry.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, nonetheless, second, so, still, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, such as, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2125.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 408.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20833333333 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79764032326 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566176470588 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 648.9 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0906307029 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.25 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1 5.45110844103 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294475987649 0.236089414692 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0850320598644 0.076458572812 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139447749019 0.0737576698707 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170671634689 0.150856017488 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12663839661 0.0645574589148 196% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.