Technology plays a crucial role in children’s lives and it is obvious that it affects their creativity. However, I do not believe that it makes them less creative when compared to the times when the technology was not that developed. I support that technology enhances their creativity in many ways.
First of all, with the increasing technology, children are able to see the world more broadly. It may actually be true that if they do not see everything that are already present, they may use their imagination better. But I still believe that seeing and learning about everything, increases the chances of catching a glimpse of a creative idea regarding any subject that has been created at any place in the world by the usage of technology. For example, my sister started studying abroad as a small child and got exposed to so much technology than most people at her age have and now she got accepted to a master’s program in design by her creative skills.
Secondly, the rapidly increasing technology level, also increases the rate at which children can think and understand, which increases their creativity. When the children are up to date with the current technology, they get an incentive to push the limits, so that they would want to create more in the future. Without having this technology, they would have less to observe and less willingness to force themselves to create more.
Finally, an important aspect of increased technology is the ability of communicating with people all around the world. When children are able to meet with people with different races, genders, life conditions; they have broader minds. They start thinking as if they are in the shoes of the others. Also when all these different children come together and think together, they make up a collective creativity, since all of them are separate individuals with different perspectives. All of this is done by the help of the increased technology and its contribution to the increased communication throughout the world.
As a result, I do not believe that technology has a negative impact on the children’s creativity. To the contrary, I support that the technology, due to the chances it creates for the children to see the improvements being done in the world, the incentives it provides for them to push the limits and the opportunity it brings for them to communicate, is doing a brilliant job in terms of improving the children’s creativity.
- TOEFL T P O 10 - Integrated Writing Task 3
- Archaeologists have recently found a fossil of a 150-million-year-old mammalknown as Repenornamus robustus (R. robustus). Interestingly, the mammal'sstomach contained the remains of a psittacosaur dinosaur. Some researchers havetherefore suggested that R. 73
- Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them. 73
- Seals, seal lions and sea otter populations started rapidly declining a few years ago. Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they respond to the specific points made in the reading passage. 73
- Tpo 9. Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.I completely disagree with this claim that nowadays children are less creative than they were in the past. Here you can see my reasons. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 299, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
...if they are in the shoes of the others. Also when all these different children come ...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, however, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, still, for example, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2061.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 409.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0391198044 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98815519053 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486552567237 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 638.1 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.3670809286 48.9658058833 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.235294118 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0588235294 20.6045352989 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.82352941176 5.45110844103 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256911954486 0.236089414692 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0893741368679 0.076458572812 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0301927698997 0.0737576698707 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145732053788 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0329492134937 0.0645574589148 51% => OK
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.