tpo2
I have had the large number of relationships since I went to school. Every relationship has a significant feature for every person, like relationships at work, at university, at home, etc. In my opinion, we should consider equal our relationships in different situations. Every relationship has some considerations which the most important is telling the truth, so I do agree with this statement because of two reasons.
First of all, I think, mutual significant things happen in the relationship, and the result of every specific action that you do in your relationship, will returns you. For instance, liers people forget issues easily, and after a while, their lies will discover quickly. If tell you a lie, after moment you could understand, and surely you have not cared about the relationship since then. In this case, you will be coming lier like your partner gradually. For instance, when I worked in a rich company last year. I had a team-work, we made friends, and the great number of projects were done by us. We had a nice relationship, but it has a big negative point that was related to her. Actually, every day she arrived at work late, and every day she made different unbelievable excuse. All of us found she told a lie, and sometimes our boss punished her, but she continued her method. After a while, I sensed which sometimes I liked to tell the lie, so I broke up with her because she had a negative impact on me.
Second, when always people the truth in their relationship, actually they give an especial energy for making a healthy relation. In this case, people do not worry about their lies, and they live conviniecly. When people try to tell lies in their connection, after a while, they will lose their self-confidence, and cannot live without the lie. When I was a university student, one of my friends addicted tell lies in different circumstances. I think, she did not have enough self-confidence because she told unreal lies about her father’s job, their home, her boyfriend and something like that. Unfortunately, she did not have convenient life because she was living with her lies, and believed them.
As a result, I prefer to have a healthy relationship without any lies, and try to avoid to have the relationship with people who like telling the lie, so I do agree with this statement, and suggest all people telling the truth in their relationships.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- TPO51 3
- TPO53 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. TPO41 65
- Some people like to work in teams Others prefer to work alone Which do you prefer Give specific reasons and examples to support your answer 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 157, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'return'
Suggestion: return
... that you do in your relationship, will returns you. For instance, liers people forget ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 83, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'avoid having'.
Suggestion: avoid having
...lationship without any lies, and try to avoid to have the relationship with people who like t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 251, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lling the truth in their relationships.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, if, second, so, then, while, for instance, i think, as a result, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 66.0 43.0788530466 153% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1989.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 411.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83941605839 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91753163004 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491484184915 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 618.3 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 13.0 1.86738351254 696% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.437041536 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.7142857143 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5714285714 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.19 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.