TPO49 Task2
Do you agree or disagree with the statement? Use specific reasons and details.
The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.
Nobody can cast doubt on the fact that humankind is a social creature. As a result friendship and networking is a pivotal part of human life. Most of the activities in the world are dependent on the other’s help and support. Hence, if people not able to develop their relations with others, they cannot enable to live easily. While many people adamantly believe that for living happily in the world, the skill of having long term relationship with people is more beneficial than snap chat and speedy networking, I fervently agree with this idea. There is a myriad of reasons to support this belief, two of which are elaborated on in the following paragraphs.
The most prominent reason which can substantially support this viewpoint is the fact that having old close friends make a chance to have safe supporters in life. The most prominent reason which can substantially support this viewpoint is the fact that having old close friends make a chance of having a backup person in life. In the time of long friendship, they will show each other the reality of their minds. As a result, this trust increases their commitment to each other and encourage them to protect their friend so they feel better in their life. My own experience demonstrates this concept. When I was a high school student, I have a classmate and we spend four years in the same class. At the first moment, I did not interested in this person but while a month after our first class we became close friends. Our friendship elaborated among the times go by. However many years passed of our relation, I feel concerned about her more and more and try to be a good supporter in her though moments in life such as the time her father died.
Another equally noteworthy reason to support the idea is that long-term friendships demonstrate a sense of faithfully and loyalty in the person. This feeling is a part of happiness in life. When a relation extended in the time, the individuals feel more responsible to each other. As a result, they try to maintain their communication. To more substantially support the above reason I can refer to a study which was conducted last year at a local university in my town. The findings of the research clearly demonstrated that there is a positive correlation between long-term relation and loyalty. With the 30 per cent increase in the loyalty concurrent with the growth in the relation period.
To recapitulate I strongly believe that the more long term friendship the more happiness in life. This is because of old friends support in the hard moments in life, and because loyalty will growth between old friends.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 728, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'interest'
Suggestion: interest
...e class. At the first moment, I did not interested in this person but while a month after ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 868, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...dship elaborated among the times go by. However many years passed of our relation, I fe...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...life such as the time her father died. Another equally noteworthy reason to sup...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, so, while, i feel, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2182.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 454.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80616740088 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61598047577 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70384116572 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473568281938 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 664.2 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8731599804 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.9166666667 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9166666667 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.95833333333 5.45110844103 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 11.8709677419 168% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178441582906 0.236089414692 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0524763823475 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510514287209 0.0737576698707 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12468426976 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0356449454715 0.0645574589148 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.