In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are todays.
Nowadays, personal cars play an avoidable role in people’s life so that they are used to them, irrespective of considering the disadvantages of them. Personally I believe that in the future people will not reliable on cars anymore. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I explore them through the following paragraphs.
In the first place, individuals will be aware of the vulnerable disadvantages of continually using of cars on environment, on their health, and so on,, more than now. Be accustomed to cars and utilizing them for any purpose, even going to close destination makes people lazy so that they prefers cars as an alternative for walking to reach their destinations, hence, their health is influenced by this badly. Besides the presence of numerous cars in street threats our environment. It is a well-established fact now that air-pollution due to cars aggravate global warming. For example, at the company that I work now, recently is held a educational course concerning global warming and climate change and factors that can badly affect these phenomenon including the excessive use of cars.
Secondly, public transportation will improve to the extent that this systems will be preferable than personal cars. According to the news, some of manufacturers are working on special kinds of trains that can reach to very high speed. Besides they pay attention to design them more attractive for consumers.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that in the upcoming years, we can see fewer cars in the streets than they are now. This is because, the awareness of people will raise more than now, and common transportation systems will be replaced by new attractive design systems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 150, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive commas
Suggestion: ,
... environment, on their health, and so on,, more than now. Be accustomed to cars an...
^^
Line 3, column 289, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'prefer'
Suggestion: prefer
...tination makes people lazy so that they prefers cars as an alternative for walking to r...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 636, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...mpany that I work now, recently is held a educational course concerning global wa...
^
Line 3, column 736, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this phenomenon' or 'these phenomena', 'these phenomenons'?
Suggestion: this phenomenon; these phenomena; these phenomenons
...hange and factors that can badly affect these phenomenon including the excessive use of cars. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 65, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...rtation will improve to the extent that this systems will be preferable than persona...
^^^^
Line 5, column 140, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'some of', you should use 'the' ('some of the manufacturers') or simply say ''some manufacturers''.
Suggestion: some of the manufacturers; some manufacturers
...n personal cars. According to the news, some of manufacturers are working on special kinds of trains ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 236, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Besides,
...ains that can reach to very high speed. Besides they pay attention to design them more ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, hence, if, second, secondly, so, well, for example, i feel, in conclusion, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1434.0 1977.66487455 73% => OK
No of words: 277.0 407.700716846 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17689530686 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.48103885553 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02968324549 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 212.727598566 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584837545126 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 618.680645161 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5656644627 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.307692308 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3076923077 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38461538462 5.45110844103 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264590384364 0.236089414692 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0952030473124 0.076458572812 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0780896537163 0.0737576698707 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165426762009 0.150856017488 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0535631171044 0.0645574589148 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.