Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study.
Whether universities should force students to take a variety of courses regardless the students’ field of study or not is a controversial matter. Although some people believe that universities should not require their students to take various courses, which vary from their field of study, I disagree with this statement because not only can it increase students’ experiences but also it helps them to find decent jobs; However, it should be said that universities should pay attention to the students’ talents and interests.
First and foremost, by and large, various studies have proved that students’ requiring to take specific courses improves their experiences germane to different subjects. It could be done just by studying and learning new materials which are chosen by universities. As an illustrated case, Watson and Crick, who found the double helix structure of DNA, were physicians. After their university forced them to take Biology class, they used this opportunity to expand their knowledge, and finally, they could detect the structure of DNA. Thus, to expand students’ experiences, universities should require their students to take different courses without paying attention to their original field of study.
Another thing coming to mind to substantiate this stand is that universities’ forcing students to take various courses helps students to find decent jobs in their societies. For instance, according to UT Southwestern University’s survey which is held in the 1990s, most students attending History courses could be able to find decent job not only in their society but also in other parts of world. Furthermore, it should be said that one of the major factors affecting to this option is versing in different cultures, traditions, and languages—which helps them to expand their communication skills as much as possible. These skills help students to make new opportunities regarding to their jobs in world.
Last but not least, nevertheless, the experiences, deriving from requiring student’s to take various courses, help the students, universities should pay attention to the students’ talents and interests. Because without adequate interests or talents in specific materials, the courses will be demanding and taxing.
In a nutshell, despite some people agree with this statement that universities should not require their students to take variegated courses without paying attention to their majors or field of study, others agree with the universities’ policy. As results, it can increase the students’ chances to expand their experiences, and find decent jobs; As well as, it should be said that the universities should opt the courses based on students’ talents and interests.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-10 | Ehsan Razmara | 73 | view |
- Soon technology will provide smart cars: cars that virtually drive themselves. A computer in the car determines the speed and route to the desired destination. The computer is in continuous contact with a global positioning system and othertechnologies th 85
- People’s lives are becoming increasing stressful nowadays and there are many reasons behind this. Many people relate this to the technological advancement while others say that high living costs and competitions are the main reasons for this stressful l 100
- TPO 7, Integrated task writing 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To achieve successful development of a country, a government should spend more money on young children's education rather than on universities' 80
- It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 93, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'taking'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: taking
...ve proved that students' requiring to take specific courses improves their experie...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 25, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'mind substantiating'.
Suggestion: mind substantiating
...ield of study. Another thing coming to mind to substantiate this stand is that universities' f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, regarding, so, thus, well, another thing, for instance, of course, as well as, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2360.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 419.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63245823389 4.8611393121 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25648431713 2.67179642975 122% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.453460620525 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 692.1 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.7149843665 48.9658058833 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.333333333 100.406767564 157% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.9333333333 20.6045352989 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5333333333 5.45110844103 193% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.408555814355 0.236089414692 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.181646056972 0.076458572812 238% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.145770991561 0.0737576698707 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.29986477378 0.150856017488 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.097026677739 0.0645574589148 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 11.7677419355 162% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 58.1214874552 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.1575268817 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 10.9000537634 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 10.002688172 200% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 10.247311828 195% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.