Nowadays, we like famous actors, athletes and pop-stars. We accept their actions and their words easily. In my opinion, this is not a good behavior towards some issues like in politics and economic cases. I believe that we should not pay attention to their opinion. I have two reasons which I explore in the following this essay.
First of all, they do not always give right answer; same with ordinary people like me. Since, what they do has nothing to do with politics or any country’s issue. For example, I like Simon Dominic. He is a rapper. He usually makes songs. Thus, he does not know about politics. However, he knows a lot about his career: rap.
Secondly, they do not know exactly what the issue is. How can they know what is literally unrelated to them? They may know some, but they may not know exactly as an expert does. To give an easy example, BTS is the most popular group in K-pop. Would they know exactly if they were asked about electronics? Though they answered, no one would believe it.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that like the circumstances above. No matter how famous you are, people do not believe you unless you are accurate and an expert to the issue mentioned.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, in conclusion, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 52.1666666667 44% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 997.0 1977.66487455 50% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 216.0 407.700716846 53% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.61574074074 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 4.48103885553 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40123407201 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 212.727598566 61% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.601851851852 0.524837075471 115% => OK
syllable_count: 312.3 618.680645161 50% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 10.0 20.1344086022 50% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.6758843552 48.9658058833 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 49.85 100.406767564 50% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 10.8 20.6045352989 52% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 5.65 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172069932487 0.236089414692 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0524372965043 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0742308080984 0.0737576698707 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117638683386 0.150856017488 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0765881780567 0.0645574589148 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 5.7 11.7677419355 48% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.25 58.1214874552 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.8 10.1575268817 47% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.33 10.9000537634 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 86.8835125448 51% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 4.0 10.002688172 40% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.0 10.0537634409 60% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 6.0 10.247311828 59% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.