When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively they are asked to work alone on projects.
Throughout the history the effective ways of learning have realized until students have better functions. One of the ways that has caused the heat debate among the academicians is that weather is more effective to work on projects as a team or do it alone. Some hold the opinion that team working will improve their functions and then, they work absolutely better. In contrast, some take opposite view and believes working alone help them to learn how to face with their problems and solve them. I firmly concur with the first group and state that without any doubts it is more beneficial for students. In the following paragraphs, I will elaborate on my points of view cogently.
The first exquisite reason to be mentioned is that if they did not work in the groups, all the responsibility and difficulties of the work will belong to one person. Working in the group provides the condition to divide the assignment among different individuals, hence, every students by doing part of the project will annoy less, or if I want to describe more, they feel less exhausted. To exemplify, when I was students at university for preparing our achievements in the exhibition every one of us accepted a part of the work so without any difficulties, we could prepare for exhibition on time.
Another equally noteworthy points in corroborating this idea is that the students how much work more and more in the groups they get more and more prepared for their social life in the future. Had they not experienced this situations, it would be greatly hard for them to get along with other members of society and communicate with them especially in the future. The results of the study conducted on the high school students in the USA revealed the students who did team working they were 70% more successful than individuals did not adopt to work in the team. On the other hand, some take opposite view and argues because sometimes there is the lack of harmony in the group, do not only persons not benefit but also they encounter with some trouble, but we could not deny the other important positive effects of it.
In brief, all the aforementioned significant reasons lead us to the conclusion that its advantages certainly weight its disadvantage and it gets ready the students to take successful decisions in their life and know people better. Consequently, they can extend their community ability and also, by solving their problems with the help of each other learn more effectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 55, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to have'
Suggestion: to have
... history the effective ways of learning have realized until students have better fun...
^^^^
Line 5, column 219, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...in the future. Had they not experienced this situations, it would be greatly hard fo...
^^^^
Line 5, column 537, Rule ID: ADOPT_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'adapt to'?
Suggestion: adapt to
...ore successful than individuals did not adopt to work in the team. On the other hand, so...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 374, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...p of each other learn more effectively.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, if, so, then, in brief, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2061.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 423.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87234042553 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70263951519 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513002364066 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 645.3 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.518540352 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.4 100.406767564 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2 20.6045352989 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330270182262 0.236089414692 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110570821073 0.076458572812 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0733475483964 0.0737576698707 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198395641147 0.150856017488 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0673523565437 0.0645574589148 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 58.1214874552 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.