When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.
Mankind always have been seek for how to educate information and transmit knowledge. Whether it comes to question that children learn better in a group or individually, there are different ideas. While some people believe that learning individually is better, others think studying in a group in more proficient. As far as I am concerned, learning individually is superior to study in a group. I will explain my reasons in the following paragraphs.
First, studying independently allow students to give their all attention to the lesson. To put it in a vivid imagination, some of learning materials, like music and math, require all of one's concentration, and just a little amount of distraction is enough to disconnect student from the lesson. For example, imagine two pupil who try to study such lesson together, just the moment one of them start to catch an important point, the other could change his/her seat, or ask a question, as a result of this the other one have to study again from the beginning. As we see, this is not only demolish one's disturbution, but also did waste they time and energy. Each of them could be more focused and learn faster if they studied by their own. Therfore individually studying is more decent because it provides being highly focused on the material.
The second point is that, studying on your own is more convenient, and tou do not need to coordinate everything with others. You decide to study and start, it's done!. To be more clear, In this way one should efficiently utilize his energy without worrying about others malpractice, moreover, by studying alone one could find his drawbacks and spend more time on that, otherwise one have to waste a lot of time on subjects that already familiar with. Beyond this kind of unnecessary coordination the result could be achieved easily, become hard and annoying. Therefore studying individually accomplish easily and with exploiting full of one's potential.
By considering all above mentioned points, I think the advantages of studying individually outweigh it's disadvantages. Because it is more suitable for being fully consummated and it is convenient as well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 135, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...t comes to question that children learn better in a group or individually, there are d...
Line 3, column 187, Rule ID: ONES
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
...ls, like music and math, require all of ones concentration, and just a little amount...
Line 3, column 321, Rule ID: CD_NN
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'pupil' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'pupils'.
...om the lesson. For example, imagine two pupil who try to study such lesson together, ...
Line 5, column 559, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
...ieved easily, become hard and annoying. Therefore studying individually accomplish easily...
Line 5, column 637, Rule ID: ONES
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
...lish easily and with exploiting full of ones potential. By considering all above ...
Line 7, column 196, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
...g fully consummated and it is convenient as well.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, well, while, for example, i think, kind of, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1803.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 356.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06460674157 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89743208293 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589887640449 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 566.1 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.6448479193 48.9658058833 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.166666667 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7777777778 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0814982367028 0.236089414692 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0281637488999 0.076458572812 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.026037988527 0.0737576698707 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0477738009993 0.150856017488 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0248569690217 0.0645574589148 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.