Which kind of professors will you choose when selecting the courses?
1. Some professors who are voted to be the most popular one.
2. Some professors who are rewarded of outstanding research.
Currently, society has witnessed an unprecedented boom in the education industry, especially the tertiary one, thus offering more options for college students to choose. However, the escalating alternatives have triggered a heated discussion that which is the optimal option for students, choosing professors who are voted to be the most prevailing one or picking professors with excellent academic performance in research. Some individuals contend that professors who gain popularity are their preferred choices. However, I cannot concur with them. I harbor the idea that professors' reward in research outcomes is my first priority when I need to give a final decision and my view can be substantiated as follows.
To start with, professors that are awarded of outstanding research tend to inculcate us more profound theoretical knowledge and empirical experience in conducting experiments in certain domains. To be more specific, since those professors have certain competitive edges in the academic circle full of fierce and stiff competition, it is self-explanatory that they are adept in explaining and imparting state-of-the-art theoretical knowledge, some of which are even ground-breaking, hence we can benefit from professors' masteries of knowledge by exploring the wonderland of scientific culminations. In addition to professors' understanding of difficult knowledge, they also excel in conducting experiments, which lays a solid foundation of their fruitful outcomes of scientific research, hence we are entitled to enter their laboratories to learn a myriad of skills or techniques that can be employed to pave the way for doing successful experiments and offset the gap existing in our theoretical knowledge and pragmatic experience. On the contrary, those professors of great popularity fail to provide such rare opportunities.
What's more, the conditions of studies in those professors' classes are much better, both the software conditions and the hardware conditions. It is obvious that key universities have a propensity that they will allocate more funds to those professors who earn high reputations in scientific achievements. Consequently, professors are entitled to expend those funds. Funds can be used to upgrade facilities of laboratories or classrooms, such as ventilation, air conditioning and things like that, which ameliorates the hardware conditions of professors' classes. Meanwhile, a bunch of talented and gifted students, driven by their curiosity for cutting-edge science, are likely to enroll in the classes given by those professors. Eventually, with more talented students who are experienced involved in classes, an exhilarating and terrific atmosphere can be fostered. For instance, during the class, students can have direct interaction with not only seasoned professors but also other students participating in classes, thus more sparkling ideas can be generated. Plus, listening to their discussion can also enhance other students' comprehension of certain knowledge, which liberates them from the constraints of perplexing theories.
Admittedly, attending courses given by prevailing professors is intriguing, nevertheless, such courses fail to strengthen my understanding of knowledge. Worse still, it is probable that all things that I can obtain from those classes are meaningless laugh and jealousy.
In a nutshell, I would like to reiterate my view that I prefer to enroll in courses taught by experienced professors who are lavishly rewarded of their outstanding research since it renders me opportunities to accumulate theoretical knowledge and practical experience simultaneously. Apart from that, I can also enjoy the terrific hardware and software conditions in such courses.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...il to provide such rare opportunities. Whats more, the conditions of studies in thos...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1122, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...their discussion can also enhance other students comprehension of certain knowledge, whi...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, still, then, thus, while, apart from, for instance, in addition, such as, on the contrary, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 24.0 11.0286738351 218% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 52.1666666667 146% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3184.0 1977.66487455 161% => OK
No of words: 549.0 407.700716846 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.79963570128 4.8611393121 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84053189512 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35800637001 2.67179642975 126% => OK
Unique words: 279.0 212.727598566 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508196721311 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 983.7 618.680645161 159% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 96.7650449434 48.9658058833 198% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.619047619 100.406767564 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1428571429 20.6045352989 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 5.45110844103 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345790472171 0.236089414692 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104287601604 0.076458572812 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0875180563508 0.0737576698707 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194935469472 0.150856017488 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.094560461605 0.0645574589148 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 11.7677419355 161% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 58.1214874552 48% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.1575268817 156% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.66 10.9000537634 153% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.01818996416 121% => OK
difficult_words: 165.0 86.8835125448 190% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.