Which one of the following do you think is the best way to get to know a city in a limited amount of time when you first visit it Touring historic sites going to markets or shops eating in restaurants or spending time in cafes

No one cany deny the fact that, people in my country always accepted and celebrated cultural attributes hroughout the whole history. On that ground, it reinforces cultural values among community members such as value, respect, good educations, personal responsibility, and etc. In this ground, some people contend that believing and accepting our ancient tradition is a part of responsibilty that people do in their lives. On the other side, there is a group of people who think that people can foloow their own footsteps and act differently from old theories. Certainly, from my vantage point, the former point contains more weight. For the following paragraphs, I will delve into most conspicuous reasons and examples justifying my stance.

The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that irrefuably, ancient belives and tradition are meant to be for good reasons which can serve a good purpose in people’s lives. In fact, some theories represent scientific perpsectives. Contrary, with modernization in last few decades, there are whole group of people whose belives get diluted, and thereby, their lives has become foreign to them which do not serve any fruitful purpose. To shed more light on it, take an example of vaccination which is given to newborn. Many parents refute to follow this method of vaccination as they thinm that their child might not bear the pain at this age. However, the basic theory behind this vaccination process is to produce antibodies in newborn’s bodies so that they can fights against severe dieases in the future. Ultimately, denying and not accepting old methods of culture might lead to bad consequences in the lives.

Another noteworthy reason is that cultural characteristics share the sense of comfort and belongings amond community. To be more specific, it enhances social bond and emotional connection between people whereby people can feel of warmth in their lives. Drawing from my own family’s example can clear the idea what has been elaborated above. Like most of other families in my country, my father and his ‘s families have been living together for longtime. The concept of living in a joint family is very prevalent in my country. I accept that when people live together in one house, they can apparently share happines in each other’s lives. On top of that, whenever any of my family members are in difficulties, we always stand for each others to fortify the difficulty by joining hands together. On the contrary, people who have not accepted old methodolgy of living in a family do not have anyone to share their happiness in the family in good times. Gradually, they start feeling of lineliness even in their own home. Admittedly, it is judicious to say that when people follow their family’s rituals, they never regret in the life.

Votes
Average: 0.3 (2 votes)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 270, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...od educations, personal responsibility, and etc. In this ground, some people contend tha...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 300, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'groups'?
Suggestion: groups
...on in last few decades, there are whole group of people whose belives get diluted, an...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 765, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'fight'
Suggestion: fight
...es in newborn’s bodies so that they can fights against severe dieases in the future. U...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, first, however, if, so, in fact, such as, on the contrary, on top of that

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2353.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 461.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10412147505 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63367139033 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73135117103 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546637744035 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 729.9 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2798928309 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.304347826 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0434782609 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.91304347826 5.45110844103 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0493261974471 0.236089414692 21% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0151192262062 0.076458572812 20% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0182568200907 0.0737576698707 25% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0371448627788 0.150856017488 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.011392260907 0.0645574589148 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 86.8835125448 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 270, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...od educations, personal responsibility, and etc. In this ground, some people contend tha...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 300, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'groups'?
Suggestion: groups
...on in last few decades, there are whole group of people whose belives get diluted, an...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 765, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'fight'
Suggestion: fight
...es in newborn’s bodies so that they can fights against severe dieases in the future. U...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, first, however, if, so, in fact, such as, on the contrary, on top of that

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2353.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 461.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10412147505 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63367139033 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73135117103 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546637744035 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 729.9 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2798928309 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.304347826 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0434782609 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.91304347826 5.45110844103 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0493261974471 0.236089414692 21% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0151192262062 0.076458572812 20% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0182568200907 0.0737576698707 25% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0371448627788 0.150856017488 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.011392260907 0.0645574589148 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 86.8835125448 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.