Which one of the following do you think is the best way to get to know a city in a limited amount of time when you first visit it? Touring historic sites; going to markets or shops; eating in restaurants or spending time in cafes.
There are many ways of knowing and learning the city history and culture. Some might said, it would be better to go to the market or even a restaurant to know the best food and local cuisine of the city, but I prefer to visit historical sites or local museum when addressing the new city. By visiting the hisorical places or museum, you would simply learn about the city's relics and artifacts and learning from the expert, the historian and museum's curators.
Travelling to a new town might seems interesting when you meet a new locals in the traditional markets or hanging out to the best cafe in the town. By meeting the locals, you can learn the local dialects and culture or find some local livestocks, like endemic fish or local meat farms. Ordering local food might also be an interesting idea by visiting the local restaurants and tasting the local cuisine. These activities is really fascinated when you are in a new town and having to know the best of city can offer to you. In Indonesia, for example, every region almost have different language or dialect spoken and have distinguished type of cuisine that the outsiders needs to check-in when they visiting those places. Although these idea might help to get know well about the city, I personally believe about visiting the historical sites or museum that matter most.
Meanwhile, if someone need to learn and study the local history and culture, histoical sites, monuments, museums offer the best choice. By asking the curators of the museum, we can simply understand the city's history in less than an hour. By knowing the city history, it will made its people to put more respect about the city and also grow the loving interest for city. In example, we would care about city historical sites and preserves them for any vandalism and destructive activities done by irresponsible people. Government and its people should help the preservation of these historical sites so that anyone who visit the city can fastly learn about city's history and culture.
To conclude, it is important to learn the city's history and culture by vising museum and historical sites to grow more respect and care about the city rather than only vising the local market or restaurants.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 70, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'local'?
Suggestion: local
...t seems interesting when you meet a new locals in the traditional markets or hanging o...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 423, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[4]
Message: You should probably use: 'are'.
Suggestion: are
...ing the local cuisine. These activities is really fascinated when you are in a new...
^^
Line 3, column 732, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this idea' or 'these ideas'?
Suggestion: this idea; these ideas
...en they visiting those places. Although these idea might help to get know well about the c...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 277, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'make'
Suggestion: make
...r. By knowing the city history, it will made its people to put more respect about th...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, really, so, well, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 30.0 13.8261648746 217% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1858.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 382.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86387434555 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47774004805 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.465968586387 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 589.5 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.4572942014 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.866666667 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4666666667 20.6045352989 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4 5.45110844103 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217571000043 0.236089414692 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0864578802293 0.076458572812 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519466993664 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145127760586 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0454917342785 0.0645574589148 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.