work together, creativity, work alone
When it comes to tasks that require creativity, some people prefer to think independently so that they can avoid others' interference, while some prefer to boost their efficiency by collaborating with others. And from my experience, I would like to work with others to solve the problems that demands creative methods.
First and foremost, working together can eliminate some unnecessary but critical mistakes. When many people get involved into one task, the problems tend to be considered for more than on time, thus making crosscheck possible. There was an well-known structure engineer who designed the structure of a library. The structure of building was really advanced, employing prestressed concrete and large span steel structures to magnify the interior space. However, without working together with the architect, the engineer forgot the loading of the books, the basic elements in the library. If the engineer could work together with the architects or other specialists, this fault could be totally avoided.
Moreover, cooperation can inspire creativity, especially when various specialists participate in a task. Because when people with different background and knowledge work together, they will offer suggestions in terms of multiple dimensions. In addition, since people have distinct way of thinking, updating thinking methods for individuals can be achieved. For example, recently, the machine learning is quite popular. However, to apply this technique to practical use, specialist in computer science need to cooperate with others from specific profession,like speech recognition. Without the assistance from linguistic experts, the algorithms will function randomly, wasting time and funding.
Last but not the least,
In conclusion,
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 238, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...s making crosscheck possible. There was an well-known structure engineer who desig...
^^
Line 5, column 556, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , like
...ate with others from specific profession,like speech recognition. Without the assista...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, really, so, thus, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 43.0788530466 26% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1509.0 1977.66487455 76% => OK
No of words: 260.0 407.700716846 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.80384615385 4.8611393121 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.48103885553 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95331275232 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.669230769231 0.524837075471 128% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 618.680645161 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.7788029155 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.6 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169772798588 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0532785824229 0.076458572812 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0651669710084 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0832116501412 0.150856017488 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0487131396994 0.0645574589148 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.06 10.9000537634 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.95 8.01818996416 124% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.