Since the dawn of civilization, routines are played a myriad role in each person’s live. While even the world has a routine cycle, humans also have it. But it can be dangerous sometimes especially in the business life. Whereas some people believe that the routine is a good thing in the business, other consider that it kills creativity. From my vantage point, I concur with latter group. The lines above will shed light on my stand point.
First exquisite point to mention is importance of creativity. I have been working in company at reporting department for 5 years. There are many different kind of reports which teach different thing. Just because of these reports, I can read my company’s financial situation and analyze it. I would not know that much information, if I would not do these reports. Furthermore, having broad knowledge may open the gates of new jobs opportunities.
Secondly, in approaching this matter, apart from what mentioned above, there is another subtle point. Doing similar tasks all day long is boring. This is not an ideal job type for me since I am an introvert person. I must do different types of tasks and discover new solution to each different problem. Thus, I may be happy in my job. Being happy in the job is significant for me since it may affect my family relation. What’s more, According to a research which conducted at MIT University, job routine increases the risk of heart attack. It also affects our health.
Lastly, Using computer is ubiquitous all the businesses. By the help of them, we can find new solutions and make it enjoyable thing.
To sum up, taking all aforementioned reasons into the account, one cannot deny the importance of doing different task during working day. On the one hand it makes you happy, on the other hand you can boost your creativity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 141, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...rting department for 5 years. There are many different kind of reports which teach different t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 156, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'kinds'?
Suggestion: kinds
...t for 5 years. There are many different kind of reports which teach different thing....
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, thus, whereas, while, apart from, kind of, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1528.0 1977.66487455 77% => OK
No of words: 313.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88178913738 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77369291619 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.635782747604 0.524837075471 121% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 618.680645161 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.1344086022 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.8599441031 48.9658058833 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 63.6666666667 100.406767564 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.0416666667 20.6045352989 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169536945501 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0463996306134 0.076458572812 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0874279798325 0.0737576698707 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0843032743185 0.150856017488 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0631821075178 0.0645574589148 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.1 11.7677419355 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.14 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.0537634409 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.