Since the dawn of civlization, friendship played vital roled in each society. Nowadays, many are adamant that a myriad of elements should be taken into consideration in order to examine its constructive and destructive facets of this issue. Due to its paramount importance, huge steps have been taken to elevate its role. Some people may hold the view that it is better to have much friend than less. However, some other take an opposide side and believe that life is not long enough to meet many person and less friend is best friend. From my vantage point, I concur with the letter group and think that number of friends is not important. The important one is qualifty of itself.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that it is hard to meet someone and believe them again and again. In our daily life, we meet with new persons that have different characters. Therefore, understanding someone who is new for you might be hard and harmful sometimes. A vivid example which can be given to shed light on the subject is one of my own experience. When I was in univesity in Germany, I used to live in domitory and have roomates. We could not be a friends since we have different personality. Therefore, I repeated one years, due to the fact It affect my classess.
Secondly, another reason which deserves some words to say is that there can be in a conflict, if you have a large group of friends. It is easy to manage couple of friends than larger one. Moreover, you can mantain your friendships if your friends have same personalitiy. Take my own example, I have 2 friends and we are friends until childhood. We like to do same things such as like playing same game or support same soccer team.
Lastly, althoug the aforementioned reasons are the fires one which cross the mind at first glance. They are by no means the only reasons available. In fact, there is another subtle point which must be borne in mind. The noteworth refreshingly intelligible statistic, reveal by a recent social reaseach conducted by a team of scientists who work at Harvard University, show that a significant percent of participated people think that having much friend and adding new ones damage healty since new friends damage mental healty.
To wrap it up, contemplanting all foresaid reasons, one soon relaize that less friend is best friends. I think everybody should have less but good friends. Morever, there many other reason which i could not write here such as
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 51, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: it
...exquisite point to be mentioned is that it it is hard to meet someone and believe the...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 477, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a friend' or simply 'friends'?
Suggestion: a friend; friends
...tory and have roomates. We could not be a friends since we have different personality. ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 292, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ersonalitiy. Take my own example, I have 2 friends and we are friend from childho...
^^
Line 5, column 74, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d reasons are the fires one which croess the mind at firest glance. They are by n...
^^
Line 7, column 196, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... Morever, there many other reason which i could not write here such as ....
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, lastly, moreover, so, i think, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 52.1666666667 65% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1417.0 1977.66487455 72% => OK
No of words: 299.0 407.700716846 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73913043478 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68260859778 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.598662207358 0.524837075471 114% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 618.680645161 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.4449085466 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.5789473684 100.406767564 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7368421053 20.6045352989 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.31578947368 5.45110844103 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117902642043 0.236089414692 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0359854115163 0.076458572812 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0320738411647 0.0737576698707 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0682339944524 0.150856017488 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0174411994167 0.0645574589148 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 11.7677419355 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 86.8835125448 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.