Since the dawn of civilization until today, teachers played significant roled in all civlizated society. Many are adamant that a myriad of element that should be taken into consideration in order to examine its constructive and destructive facets of this matter.Some people may take hold the view that they are significant for us since they teacher everything about the world. However, others take an opposite side and believe that it is fallacy. From my vantage point, I concur with the former group and the lines below will shedn on light to my viewpoint.
First of all, the first exquisite point to mention that is ti importance of the time we consume with friends. Due to contuniely changing world, kids spent much more time with friends rather than their teacher even families. They play game together after study and typing on the whatsup even when they are away. Consequently, teachers have less effect on their life. A noteworthy refreshingly intelligible statistics, reveals by a recent research at MIT University in the USA, shows that The young seems their friends as a role model than their teachers and families. They choose same universities even same majors. The research study has been conducted between the young people from the same age group in ten different high schools. That is, the new generation have different values than older one.
Secondly, in appraching to the this issue, there is another subtle point which must be borne in mind. Wile world is changing also values changed. There are many new invention such as web sites, online games which teachers who do not know. The teacher do not speak same languange with kids since they are not familiar with new roled. Therefore, this gap makes teachers less interesting. A vivid example which can be given to the subject is my own experience. When I wan in university, there was an event about computers. All student almost came to ther since the teacher's super knowledge about it. We learnt lots of think since the teacher told us how it works. Not all teacher likes him. Most of them do not have any idea about the new technology.
To wrap up, one can conculed that teachers do not increase their knowledge about the new worlds. This situation makes them less attractive on the kids's eyes. If they can change, of course they influence the young people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 263, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Some
...e and destructive facets of this matter.Some people may take hold the view that they...
^^^^
Line 4, column 429, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'recent research'.
Suggestion: recent research
...gly intelligible statistics, reveals by a recent research at MIT University in the USA, shows tha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 28, Rule ID: DT_DT[2]
Message: Maybe you need to remove the second determiner so that only 'the' or 'this' is left.
Suggestion: the; this
...er one. Secondly, in appraching to the this issue, there is another subtle point wh...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 162, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'invention'.
Suggestion: invention
...ing also values changed. There are many new invention such as web sites, online games which t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 613, Rule ID: LEARN_NNNNS_ON_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to'?
Suggestion: to
...uper knowledge about it. We learnt lots of think since the teacher told us how it ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, of course, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1945.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 397.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89924433249 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5174958349 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576826196474 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 595.8 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.5877084407 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.8076923077 100.406767564 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2692307692 20.6045352989 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.23076923077 5.45110844103 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.88709677419 266% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226404497865 0.236089414692 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0560793064538 0.076458572812 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634286558092 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127199553803 0.150856017488 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.059984425064 0.0645574589148 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 11.7677419355 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.