Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The debates on which are more favorable according to workers - doing various kinds of tasks or doing the same tasks all day has garnered a range of views. Nowadays, many are adamant that a myriad of elements should be taken into consideration to examine the constructive and destructive facets of this issue. Some people posit that accomplishing different types of tasks outweighs the cons of doing the same missions. On the other hand, some others take the opposite side and disagree. From my vantage point, I concur with the former group. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following paragraphs.
The first exquisite point to be considered is that the improvement of productivity. When workers can achieve various kinds of tasks during the day, they will never feel bored. Consequently, the productivity rate of each worker will climb noticeably. A vivid example that can shed light on this subject is one from my experience. Last year, I worked as a part-time lecturer in a college. Fortunately, my work was full of varied kinds of duties, from teaching students to supervising the students club in the college. And as a result, my productivity was very high because I had never felt bored with the job. All in all, the diversity of duties in the profession will enhance the productivity level of the worker.
Secondly, the second reason which deserves some words to say is that carrying out varied kinds of jobs in the workday will equip the workers with beneficial skills and tools. Although doing the same missions in the day seems easier, doing different things in the work will help the person to improve their imagination and problem-solving skills. My personal experience is a compelling example of this issue. During my time at university, I had to work on various things at the same time. I did my graduation project, also I worked as a student union member. This situation had equipped me with many skills, such as communication skills and problem-solving skills.
To wraps it up, In the light of above-mentioned reasons, I strongly believe that having different types of functions during the day is better than doing similar duties all day long.
- The cost of converting money from one national currency to another is very high Moreover differences in currency value can make market prices unstable discouraging international trade and travel A group of countries in Europe has been able to avoid many o 3
- Private collectors have been selling and buying fossils, the petrified remains of ancient organisms, ever since the eighteenth century. In recent years, however, the sale of fossils, particularly of dinosaurs and other large vertebrates, has grown into a 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.Use specific reasons and examples to supp 70
- The zebra mussel, a freshwater shellfish native to Eastern Europe, has long been spreading out from its original habitats and has now reached parts of North America. There are reasons to believe that this invasion cannot be stopped and that it poses a ser 68
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
...similar duties all day long.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, if, second, secondly, so, i feel, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1860.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 370.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02702702703 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85404908022 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532432432432 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.8407259812 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.5714285714 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.619047619 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7619047619 5.45110844103 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265752506914 0.236089414692 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0651148697954 0.076458572812 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0910425897971 0.0737576698707 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169222822388 0.150856017488 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0642194881627 0.0645574589148 99% => OK
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.